Active Users:434 Time:18/09/2025 08:36:40 AM
The only logical answer... Shannow Send a noteboard - 22/12/2009 10:07:40 PM
I would think this would be the sort of item you would keep on yourself at all times, even when reporting to the Bore to visit the Dark One; with the commands and punishments for using the Power there, only the most idiotic Forsaken would try and rid themseves of an opponent within range of that area.



...other than the obvious one, which is that it is another RJ plotconvenience, is that the Dark One, being a paranoid SoB in RJ's words, would view the potential threat of any angreal as a reason to suspect you of treachery. And take you out in a kind of pre-emptive strike, so to speak.

Otherwise I'd have suspected the Forsaken to not only carry the strongest possible sa'angreal in their posesssion, but since they evidently stack up as shown by Rand in Rhuidean, to wear the strongest ring sa'angreal, together with the strongest waistband sa'angreal, together with the strongest neckchain sa'angreal, together with the strongest wristband sa'angreal etc. etc.

In fact, I'd expect each Forsaken to be so weighted down by various ornamental sa'angreal, that they'd struggle to walk up the path to Shayol Ghul. Personally, I find it unconvincing that angreal and sa'angreal can stack their power. For the very reason that channelers should then have worn the maximum amount possible, to the extent that they remain seated in their wagon, or rather, lying outstretched to touch as much of their pile of sa'angreal as they can at any one time.

Think Scrooge Mcduck diving into his pile of gold. Same thing with Demandred and his pile of sa'angreal. Touch as many as you can with various bodily extremities in order to channel a little more than Sammael, who can touch fewer sa'angreal at once due to his shorter stature.

Hmmm. No wonder the tall guys were so powerful...
Reply to message
Callandor - 22/12/2009 12:52:43 PM 1604 Views
I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 02:10:57 PM 955 Views
Re: I think because it's smaller... - 22/12/2009 05:40:28 PM 1111 Views
RJ on Callandor and its flaw - 22/12/2009 02:49:11 PM 1386 Views
Damn you for stealing my thunder! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:53:41 PM 469 Views
Always a pleasure! *NM* - 22/12/2009 02:58:29 PM 426 Views
I'm gonna have to be faster on the trigger with you around... - 22/12/2009 03:01:04 PM 801 Views
I use the Theoryland database. *NM* - 22/12/2009 05:03:06 PM 419 Views
It's always strange to me how despite mass production of angreal and sa'angreal no Forsaken had one - 22/12/2009 09:15:27 PM 815 Views
The only logical answer... - 22/12/2009 10:07:40 PM 925 Views
Stacking up power - 23/12/2009 10:46:46 AM 804 Views
Ummm, why would they seal and ward a flawed sa'angreal in the Stone...? - 22/12/2009 11:42:03 PM 794 Views
Prophecy *NM* - 23/12/2009 12:43:59 AM 450 Views
Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 02:53:23 PM 1051 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 05:00:29 PM 862 Views
The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 05:46:41 PM 1149 Views
Re: The Nazi's did have that weapon. - 22/12/2009 06:54:05 PM 860 Views
Where does it say LTT used it? - 22/12/2009 07:29:02 PM 923 Views
I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 07:40:36 PM 805 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 22/12/2009 11:11:53 PM 804 Views
Re: I seem to recall... - 23/12/2009 03:13:50 PM 855 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ... - 22/12/2009 07:32:53 PM 795 Views
That seems to be just his paranoia talking *NM* - 22/12/2009 07:48:11 PM 410 Views
While I agree... - 22/12/2009 08:11:27 PM 814 Views
How funny is it that they're mass-producing crystalline swords and humanoid statuettes? - 22/12/2009 09:18:33 PM 846 Views
I had a theory... - 22/12/2009 09:25:57 PM 889 Views
Since they were mass produced, I reckon each Forsaken probably had a personal sa'angreal... - 22/12/2009 09:49:14 PM 792 Views
*oops* - 23/12/2009 05:45:32 PM 748 Views
What if I wanted to keep it on my coffee table?? - 23/12/2009 03:57:45 AM 827 Views
Don't forget sa'angreal the size of the Colossus of Rhodes *NM* - 23/12/2009 05:43:10 PM 821 Views
Re: Callandor - 22/12/2009 11:09:26 PM 953 Views
Perhaps a - 23/12/2009 06:23:21 AM 822 Views
Re: Callandor - 23/12/2009 11:07:20 AM 770 Views
That doesn't really fly... - 23/12/2009 03:24:11 PM 810 Views
It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 05:53:09 PM 914 Views
Re: It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal. - 23/12/2009 06:54:49 PM 741 Views
It could well fly - 24/12/2009 10:23:37 AM 857 Views

Reply to Message