Has anyone asked BS/RJ WHY Callandor lacks the safety buffer? According to The Guide LTT used this sword as a weapon against Shadow. According to some earlier WoT books the 'urban myth' among some knowledgable Aes Sedai was that it wasn't finished. This sounds a bit..... vague. If they manage to finish the Choedan Kal at the end of the war of the shadow, surely they would have been able to finish Callandor before during earlier stages of the war??
Please dont reply with: But maybe it was almost finished and then dreadlords attacked and disrupted the final tuning process etc or some other BS (BS doesn't mean Brandon Sanderson here btw
) Do we have any real clues? Is it missing a piece or something? Ring of the Tamyrlin?? ( sorry, that last one was really lame)
Please dont reply with: But maybe it was almost finished and then dreadlords attacked and disrupted the final tuning process etc or some other BS (BS doesn't mean Brandon Sanderson here btw
) Do we have any real clues? Is it missing a piece or something? Ring of the Tamyrlin?? ( sorry, that last one was really lame)Another question about manufacturing angreal etc... I have been wondering why the forsaken don't make their own. Sure it could be a Talent thing, but I'd expect it to have shown itself in one of the wonder girls by now or some random Asha'man.
Could it be that men and women have to link to make them? Would explain why it hasn't been done for 3k-4k years and WHY THE FORSAKEN HAVEN'T MANUFACTURED NEW ONES ( put that in capitals so we wont get answers like: 'But travelling was forgotten so why not the making of angreal??' etc etc).
Guess even female forsaken are reluctant to link but to my understanding the same contraints are not imposed on two women linking as to a man and woman regarding who's in charge. Remember that Sammael and Graendal had a discussion concerning linking to defeat Rand and Sammael didn't like that idea. Hence no linking male - female forsaken no angreals.

Or maybe 'standing flows' are needed? Exposing power wrought objects to the one power in a certain way (attuning them to frequencies being able to amplify the OP flows) for such a long time that channelers would tire themselves out if they tried to do it 'manually'?
Who knows... well... hope BS does
Callandor
- 22/12/2009 12:52:43 PM
1854 Views
RJ on Callandor and its flaw
- 22/12/2009 02:49:11 PM
1681 Views
Damn you for stealing my thunder! *NM*
- 22/12/2009 02:53:41 PM
596 Views
Always a pleasure!
*NM*
- 22/12/2009 02:58:29 PM
550 Views
*NM*
- 22/12/2009 02:58:29 PM
550 Views
It's always strange to me how despite mass production of angreal and sa'angreal no Forsaken had one
- 22/12/2009 09:15:27 PM
1066 Views
Ummm, why would they seal and ward a flawed sa'angreal in the Stone...?
- 22/12/2009 11:42:03 PM
1102 Views
Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ...
- 22/12/2009 02:53:23 PM
1373 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ...
- 22/12/2009 05:00:29 PM
1179 Views
The Nazi's did have that weapon.
- 22/12/2009 05:46:41 PM
1443 Views
Re: The Nazi's did have that weapon.
- 22/12/2009 06:54:05 PM
1116 Views
Where does it say LTT used it?
- 22/12/2009 07:29:02 PM
1190 Views
I seem to recall...
- 22/12/2009 07:40:36 PM
1060 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ...
- 22/12/2009 05:04:17 PM
1125 Views
Rand used the fat man to over power Asmodean when they were screwing around in Rhuidean *NM*
- 22/12/2009 06:12:39 PM
528 Views
Re: Here's the exact answer, straight from RJ...
- 22/12/2009 07:32:53 PM
1095 Views
How funny is it that they're mass-producing crystalline swords and humanoid statuettes?
- 22/12/2009 09:18:33 PM
1117 Views
Since they were mass produced, I reckon each Forsaken probably had a personal sa'angreal...
- 22/12/2009 09:49:14 PM
1041 Views
If sa'angreal were massproduced, it is a wonder that the world wasn't destroyed during the WoP, IMO
- 22/12/2009 10:26:47 PM
1298 Views
Re: Callandor
- 22/12/2009 11:09:26 PM
1252 Views
Re: Callandor
- 23/12/2009 11:07:20 AM
1012 Views
That doesn't really fly...
- 23/12/2009 03:24:11 PM
1139 Views
It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal.
- 23/12/2009 05:53:09 PM
1174 Views
Re: It must be different for angreal/sa'angreal vs. ter'angreal.
- 23/12/2009 06:54:49 PM
1023 Views

*NM*