Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books
taura-tierno Send a noteboard - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM
phrases like "the strongest Aes Sedai wielding the most powerful sa'angreal..."
if the angreal are only reservoirs, then the AS strength wouldn't matter.
if the angreal are only reservoirs, then the AS strength wouldn't matter.
If the sa'angreal strength is added to the "normal" strength of an Aes Sedai, it might make a difference. Not much by comparison, true, but "the strongest Aes Sedai wielding the most powerful sa'angreal" also sounds much more dramatic to say than "the weakest novie wielding the most powerful sa'angreal".
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong...
12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM
- 1517 Views
You should include quotes
12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM
- 703 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle.
12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM
- 758 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle.
12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM
- 690 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle.
12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM
- 664 Views
Please elaborate...
12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM
- 670 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group.
12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM
- 622 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once.
12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM
- 644 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle
12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM
- 808 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal?
12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM
- 785 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM*
12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM
- 297 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM*
13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM
- 320 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal...
12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM
- 697 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take
12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM
- 693 Views
Wrong place *ignore*
12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM
- 597 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory?
12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM
- 578 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM*
12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM
- 295 Views
You are missing two important points
12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM
- 781 Views
Response to both points...
12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM
- 685 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted.
12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM
- 583 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books.
12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM
- 640 Views
Probably
12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM
- 975 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work...
13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM
- 596 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt
13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM
- 611 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books
19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM
- 541 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books
27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM
- 555 Views