Active Users:584 Time:22/12/2025 02:45:15 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno Send a noteboard - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM
phrases like "the strongest Aes Sedai wielding the most powerful sa'angreal..."

if the angreal are only reservoirs, then the AS strength wouldn't matter.


If the sa'angreal strength is added to the "normal" strength of an Aes Sedai, it might make a difference. Not much by comparison, true, but "the strongest Aes Sedai wielding the most powerful sa'angreal" also sounds much more dramatic to say than "the weakest novie wielding the most powerful sa'angreal".
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1794 Views
You should include quotes TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 963 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 1028 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Watcher - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 942 Views
Sure, I agree... Shannow - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 893 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 928 Views
Please elaborate... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 913 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 891 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 917 Views
How generous of you. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 1000 Views
Scrap that TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 883 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle Insomdeon - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 1067 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 941 Views
I could have sprayed TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 900 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 1051 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 414 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* Blaine - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 468 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... Shannow - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 1004 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 990 Views
Wrong place *ignore* Sidious - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 877 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 836 Views
I do *NM* Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 374 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 395 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 884 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM 411 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? TheUltimateReality - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 924 Views
You are missing two important points PatAtt - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 1108 Views
Response to both points... Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM 972 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted. Shannow - 12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM 841 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books. Tedtheman - 12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM 917 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow Marshall - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 864 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1381 Views
Oh, also Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 914 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 406 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory Jim - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 804 Views
Probably Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1260 Views
Agreed, with one point Marshall - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 837 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... fionwe1987 - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 877 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 890 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 790 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 883 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 794 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 816 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes