Active Users:479 Time:02/06/2026 10:48:42 PM
2. Evil but necessary. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM
It is a form of energy like saidin or saidar, but it's association with the Dark One made this an evil act that was made necessary due to the situation.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 05:31:34 PM 1250 Views
2. Evil but necessary. - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM 611 Views
It corrupts you, if you use it too often - 12/01/2010 05:45:28 PM 726 Views
There's an old Aiel saying..... - 12/01/2010 05:45:41 PM 797 Views
I don't think Rand did know. - 12/01/2010 06:11:10 PM 708 Views
Rand had learned of the TP before - 12/01/2010 07:04:31 PM 682 Views
Don't forget what we learned from the ending... - 13/01/2010 11:18:46 PM 539 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 06:23:40 PM 634 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 07:46:05 PM 662 Views
Not evil. - 12/01/2010 07:48:10 PM 587 Views
EVIL!!! - 12/01/2010 09:42:48 PM 618 Views
A few corallary questions: Does it make a difference ... - 12/01/2010 10:14:29 PM 592 Views
More or less... Yes. - 12/01/2010 10:50:58 PM 599 Views
Huh? - 12/01/2010 11:04:46 PM 597 Views
+1 - 12/01/2010 11:08:52 PM 684 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 04:50:59 AM 646 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 11:19:01 AM 620 Views
I think this argument is relatively akin to real world ones like - 13/01/2010 01:15:01 AM 597 Views
But it's the essence of the Dark One. - 13/01/2010 01:43:10 AM 550 Views
As of right now, I don't think it does. - 13/01/2010 02:19:19 AM 547 Views
I kind of assumed the "halo of black" - 13/01/2010 05:13:38 AM 579 Views
Not as long as he doesn't do it again *NM* - 13/01/2010 03:42:27 AM 255 Views
Re: Not as long as he doesn't do it again - 13/01/2010 03:59:32 AM 620 Views
Somewhere between 1 and 2 - 13/01/2010 11:32:34 PM 586 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 17/01/2010 06:40:43 AM 594 Views

Reply to Message