Active Users:479 Time:05/03/2026 01:21:01 AM
2. Evil but necessary. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM
It is a form of energy like saidin or saidar, but it's association with the Dark One made this an evil act that was made necessary due to the situation.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 05:31:34 PM 1214 Views
2. Evil but necessary. - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM 570 Views
It corrupts you, if you use it too often - 12/01/2010 05:45:28 PM 696 Views
There's an old Aiel saying..... - 12/01/2010 05:45:41 PM 760 Views
I don't think Rand did know. - 12/01/2010 06:11:10 PM 677 Views
Rand had learned of the TP before - 12/01/2010 07:04:31 PM 649 Views
Don't forget what we learned from the ending... - 13/01/2010 11:18:46 PM 503 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 06:23:40 PM 599 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 07:46:05 PM 629 Views
Not evil. - 12/01/2010 07:48:10 PM 553 Views
EVIL!!! - 12/01/2010 09:42:48 PM 583 Views
A few corallary questions: Does it make a difference ... - 12/01/2010 10:14:29 PM 557 Views
More or less... Yes. - 12/01/2010 10:50:58 PM 558 Views
Huh? - 12/01/2010 11:04:46 PM 557 Views
+1 - 12/01/2010 11:08:52 PM 652 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 04:50:59 AM 612 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 11:19:01 AM 587 Views
I think this argument is relatively akin to real world ones like - 13/01/2010 01:15:01 AM 564 Views
But it's the essence of the Dark One. - 13/01/2010 01:43:10 AM 517 Views
As of right now, I don't think it does. - 13/01/2010 02:19:19 AM 514 Views
I kind of assumed the "halo of black" - 13/01/2010 05:13:38 AM 547 Views
Not as long as he doesn't do it again *NM* - 13/01/2010 03:42:27 AM 240 Views
Re: Not as long as he doesn't do it again - 13/01/2010 03:59:32 AM 587 Views
Somewhere between 1 and 2 - 13/01/2010 11:32:34 PM 546 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 17/01/2010 06:40:43 AM 554 Views

Reply to Message