Active Users:174 Time:19/05/2024 10:33:30 AM
2. Evil but necessary. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM
It is a form of energy like saidin or saidar, but it's association with the Dark One made this an evil act that was made necessary due to the situation.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 05:31:34 PM 1028 Views
2. Evil but necessary. - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM 391 Views
It corrupts you, if you use it too often - 12/01/2010 05:45:28 PM 478 Views
There's an old Aiel saying..... - 12/01/2010 05:45:41 PM 582 Views
I don't think Rand did know. - 12/01/2010 06:11:10 PM 485 Views
Rand had learned of the TP before - 12/01/2010 07:04:31 PM 452 Views
Don't forget what we learned from the ending... - 13/01/2010 11:18:46 PM 325 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 06:23:40 PM 417 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 07:46:05 PM 435 Views
Not evil. - 12/01/2010 07:48:10 PM 360 Views
EVIL!!! - 12/01/2010 09:42:48 PM 382 Views
A few corallary questions: Does it make a difference ... - 12/01/2010 10:14:29 PM 377 Views
More or less... Yes. - 12/01/2010 10:50:58 PM 391 Views
Huh? - 12/01/2010 11:04:46 PM 350 Views
+1 - 12/01/2010 11:08:52 PM 456 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 04:50:59 AM 410 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 11:19:01 AM 392 Views
I think this argument is relatively akin to real world ones like - 13/01/2010 01:15:01 AM 374 Views
But it's the essence of the Dark One. - 13/01/2010 01:43:10 AM 331 Views
As of right now, I don't think it does. - 13/01/2010 02:19:19 AM 343 Views
I kind of assumed the "halo of black" - 13/01/2010 05:13:38 AM 370 Views
Not as long as he doesn't do it again *NM* - 13/01/2010 03:42:27 AM 166 Views
Re: Not as long as he doesn't do it again - 13/01/2010 03:59:32 AM 388 Views
Somewhere between 1 and 2 - 13/01/2010 11:32:34 PM 360 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 17/01/2010 06:40:43 AM 378 Views

Reply to Message