Active Users:715 Time:19/12/2025 05:23:02 PM
2. Evil but necessary. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM
It is a form of energy like saidin or saidar, but it's association with the Dark One made this an evil act that was made necessary due to the situation.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 05:31:34 PM 1181 Views
2. Evil but necessary. - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM 543 Views
It corrupts you, if you use it too often - 12/01/2010 05:45:28 PM 653 Views
There's an old Aiel saying..... - 12/01/2010 05:45:41 PM 731 Views
I don't think Rand did know. - 12/01/2010 06:11:10 PM 640 Views
Rand had learned of the TP before - 12/01/2010 07:04:31 PM 619 Views
Don't forget what we learned from the ending... - 13/01/2010 11:18:46 PM 476 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 06:23:40 PM 568 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 07:46:05 PM 594 Views
Not evil. - 12/01/2010 07:48:10 PM 516 Views
EVIL!!! - 12/01/2010 09:42:48 PM 544 Views
A few corallary questions: Does it make a difference ... - 12/01/2010 10:14:29 PM 528 Views
More or less... Yes. - 12/01/2010 10:50:58 PM 532 Views
Huh? - 12/01/2010 11:04:46 PM 526 Views
+1 - 12/01/2010 11:08:52 PM 617 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 04:50:59 AM 583 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 11:19:01 AM 553 Views
I think this argument is relatively akin to real world ones like - 13/01/2010 01:15:01 AM 529 Views
But it's the essence of the Dark One. - 13/01/2010 01:43:10 AM 492 Views
As of right now, I don't think it does. - 13/01/2010 02:19:19 AM 489 Views
I kind of assumed the "halo of black" - 13/01/2010 05:13:38 AM 517 Views
Not as long as he doesn't do it again *NM* - 13/01/2010 03:42:27 AM 232 Views
Re: Not as long as he doesn't do it again - 13/01/2010 03:59:32 AM 551 Views
Somewhere between 1 and 2 - 13/01/2010 11:32:34 PM 516 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 17/01/2010 06:40:43 AM 524 Views

Reply to Message