Active Users:541 Time:02/06/2026 11:53:20 PM
2. Evil but necessary. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM
It is a form of energy like saidin or saidar, but it's association with the Dark One made this an evil act that was made necessary due to the situation.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 05:31:34 PM 1252 Views
2. Evil but necessary. - 12/01/2010 05:37:13 PM 613 Views
It corrupts you, if you use it too often - 12/01/2010 05:45:28 PM 728 Views
There's an old Aiel saying..... - 12/01/2010 05:45:41 PM 799 Views
I don't think Rand did know. - 12/01/2010 06:11:10 PM 709 Views
Rand had learned of the TP before - 12/01/2010 07:04:31 PM 684 Views
Don't forget what we learned from the ending... - 13/01/2010 11:18:46 PM 542 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 06:23:40 PM 635 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 12/01/2010 07:46:05 PM 663 Views
Not evil. - 12/01/2010 07:48:10 PM 588 Views
EVIL!!! - 12/01/2010 09:42:48 PM 620 Views
A few corallary questions: Does it make a difference ... - 12/01/2010 10:14:29 PM 594 Views
More or less... Yes. - 12/01/2010 10:50:58 PM 600 Views
Huh? - 12/01/2010 11:04:46 PM 599 Views
+1 - 12/01/2010 11:08:52 PM 686 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 04:50:59 AM 648 Views
Re: Huh? - 13/01/2010 11:19:01 AM 622 Views
I think this argument is relatively akin to real world ones like - 13/01/2010 01:15:01 AM 599 Views
But it's the essence of the Dark One. - 13/01/2010 01:43:10 AM 552 Views
As of right now, I don't think it does. - 13/01/2010 02:19:19 AM 550 Views
I kind of assumed the "halo of black" - 13/01/2010 05:13:38 AM 580 Views
Not as long as he doesn't do it again *NM* - 13/01/2010 03:42:27 AM 257 Views
Re: Not as long as he doesn't do it again - 13/01/2010 03:59:32 AM 622 Views
Somewhere between 1 and 2 - 13/01/2010 11:32:34 PM 588 Views
Re: Was Rand evil to channel the True Power? - 17/01/2010 06:40:43 AM 595 Views

Reply to Message