Active Users:509 Time:15/11/2025 06:40:31 AM
I considered that ... Shishka Send a noteboard - 18/01/2010 10:11:32 PM
and they seemingly revert back to about they age they were when they would have looked had they never taken the Oaths.


It's hard to say. Let's say that the normal lifespan for non-channelers is 75years. So, when a channeler starts channeling at age 15, let's say her remaining (unoathbound) years go from 60 to 600. That means, she ages at about 1/10th the "normal" rate of non-channelers. So, 2X that unoathbound rate (for oathbound channelers) would be 1/5th the normal rate.

Siuan and Leane had only been oathbound for ~20 years when they were stilled. Which means they aged 4 years (20/5) during that time. If the 2X rate reverted to 1X after they were stilled, then they would have only aged 2 years during that time, instead of 4. So, we're only talking about a visible age different of 2 years - two small, I think, to know whether the 2X affect was reversed or not.

I find this a giant hint/clue that you are correct and the only reason we haven't seen it when others remove the Oaths is that it takes some time to kick in (circumvented by Siuan and Leane due to the brutality involved). I suspect the 3 AS Rand Stilled will likely be showing signs of being unbound should we ever see them again.


If those 3 AS have been AS significantly longer than 20 years, their visibile appearance now would give us a better idea on this issue than Siuan and Leane.

I also seems to be logical to me that the AoL developers probably would have wanted a system that didn't have a long term affect on someone who was only going to be bound for a 100 years or something ... kind of like a prison sentence. Perhaps a first offense for something minor was along the lines of "you shall be bound for 50 years against crime X" if that 50 years took 100 years off of the persons life it's a much more severe punishment.


Agreed, otherwise they wouldn't have designed the Binder so that the oaths could be removed. Why design it so the oaths could be removed, if the lifespan affect couldn't also be reversed?
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.

-BHT&tM
Reply to message
Mesaana and defeating the Oath Rod - 18/01/2010 04:50:29 PM 2710 Views
I'm think Mesaana's hand is quicker than the eye - 18/01/2010 05:12:12 PM 1349 Views
Re: I'm think Mesaana's hand is quicker than the eye - 18/01/2010 05:43:26 PM 1259 Views
I like that idea ... - 18/01/2010 06:07:09 PM 1142 Views
A little archaic though - 18/01/2010 06:58:04 PM 1131 Views
Just because she's an academic ... - 18/01/2010 08:27:50 PM 1238 Views
Re: I'm think Mesaana's hand is quicker than the eye - 18/01/2010 05:58:44 PM 1131 Views
I don't think Messana would have fallen over dead - 18/01/2010 06:06:35 PM 1177 Views
I agree ... - 18/01/2010 06:15:25 PM 1066 Views
I'm not sure - 18/01/2010 06:54:51 PM 1080 Views
It didn't when Romanda retook her Oaths in TGS - 18/01/2010 07:13:20 PM 906 Views
Hmmm ... - 18/01/2010 07:24:51 PM 1081 Views
No she unswore them and retook them - 18/01/2010 07:33:30 PM 1126 Views
I'm not sure I follow - 18/01/2010 07:41:19 PM 1105 Views
The point I was trying to make was ... - 18/01/2010 08:05:16 PM 902 Views
Now I get it ... seems needlessly complex for the Oath Rod though - 18/01/2010 08:21:35 PM 895 Views
Yes, this is what I was thinking *NM* - 18/01/2010 08:29:20 PM 437 Views
What you suggested is pretty much what I've always thought ... - 18/01/2010 08:39:30 PM 906 Views
yup - 18/01/2010 09:02:04 PM 784 Views
I'm with you, though ... - 18/01/2010 09:27:59 PM 1064 Views
The closest evidence we have is a Stilled/Burned out woman - 18/01/2010 09:49:41 PM 914 Views
But if being unbound reverts you to your normal lifespan, then being bound isn't really a punishment *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:52:29 PM 439 Views
Sure it is - 18/01/2010 10:02:09 PM 932 Views
Also ... - 18/01/2010 10:13:38 PM 911 Views
I considered that ... - 18/01/2010 10:11:32 PM 1010 Views
I doubt we'll ever really know - 18/01/2010 10:26:43 PM 938 Views
Re: I'm not sure - 18/01/2010 07:22:34 PM 984 Views
interesting - 18/01/2010 07:46:12 PM 801 Views
Re: interesting - 18/01/2010 08:18:11 PM 944 Views
see above *NM* - 18/01/2010 08:23:28 PM 467 Views
I think it more like aging them faster... - 18/01/2010 08:24:56 PM 997 Views
and given how things in the AoL works this seems far more likely - 18/01/2010 08:32:52 PM 946 Views
Re: I'm not sure - 20/01/2010 12:59:27 PM 947 Views
She's not immortal ... yet - 20/01/2010 04:15:03 PM 842 Views
The Dark Ones Mark possibly could black the oath rod? *NM* - 20/01/2010 01:28:08 AM 451 Views
No, that can't be it, because when AS become Black Ajah ... - 20/01/2010 02:53:21 PM 867 Views
But Alviarin's mark is different. Perhaps the mark of a FS is too *NM* - 20/01/2010 04:21:16 PM 413 Views
Good point. I sort of misinterpreted what Kieran was suggesting. *NM* - 20/01/2010 07:19:02 PM 428 Views
Re: Good point. I sort of misinterpreted what Kieran was suggesting. - 22/01/2010 01:52:51 AM 1080 Views
actually it's different - 22/01/2010 07:32:18 AM 982 Views
actually I think it's the same... - 23/01/2010 01:49:19 AM 680 Views
One point... - 18/01/2010 06:12:26 PM 1075 Views
Good point ... - 18/01/2010 06:21:22 PM 860 Views
here's another quote that gives us - 18/01/2010 07:12:09 PM 1124 Views
FYI ... - 18/01/2010 06:50:22 PM 1025 Views
Re: FYI ... - 18/01/2010 06:56:02 PM 1086 Views
Therava channeled the flow, in that case ... - 18/01/2010 07:11:00 PM 758 Views
Yes - 18/01/2010 06:55:22 PM 843 Views
Re: I'm think Mesaana's hand is quicker than the eye - 18/01/2010 06:10:45 PM 912 Views
Re: Replacing it with a fake - 18/01/2010 06:22:33 PM 884 Views
I highly doubt it ... - 18/01/2010 06:23:55 PM 937 Views
Why not ask somebody else to stand in for you? - 19/01/2010 07:55:39 PM 971 Views
I like this idea. *NM* - 20/01/2010 03:11:51 AM 416 Views
I agree... - 18/01/2010 06:55:33 PM 1052 Views
Re: Mesaana and defeating the Oath Rod - 18/01/2010 09:43:34 PM 1031 Views
I'm thinking the point of the thread is to discuss how to beat the Oath Rod, not Mesaana's disguise - 18/01/2010 09:59:18 PM 859 Views
Right, and also ... - 18/01/2010 10:17:11 PM 883 Views
IMHO... - 19/01/2010 03:41:10 AM 1079 Views
Another interesting possibility - 19/01/2010 05:08:42 PM 874 Views
I'd say it was highly unlikely that the Binder/Oath Rod works that way. *NM* - 19/01/2010 06:06:49 PM 376 Views
We've seen pretty weird stuff happens before - 19/01/2010 06:30:12 PM 962 Views
Oh, I agree ... - 19/01/2010 06:47:52 PM 750 Views
Re: Oh, I agree ... found a few tidbits ... EDIT - 19/01/2010 06:55:22 PM 892 Views
Heh, I had just dug up that quote myself, before I saw your edit ... - 19/01/2010 07:17:19 PM 912 Views
I agree, it seems as if Moghedien just effectively transmigrated Birgitte - 19/01/2010 10:00:45 PM 986 Views
she could just be posing as a non-channeler. - 19/01/2010 05:52:01 PM 864 Views
To speak no word that is not true - 19/01/2010 10:06:30 PM 932 Views
Could there be a true word, though? - 20/01/2010 03:47:46 PM 1269 Views
In going through some old RJ quotes I found this gem... - 19/01/2010 10:22:03 PM 1206 Views
Good find, I had forgotten about that quote ... - 20/01/2010 02:42:55 PM 934 Views
Yes - 20/01/2010 03:03:53 PM 930 Views
Agreed - our guts are thinking alike again. *NM* - 20/01/2010 03:12:30 PM 420 Views
Indeed - 20/01/2010 03:28:12 PM 807 Views
Oh I agree! I just thought it was funny that RJ made such a quote - 20/01/2010 04:20:09 PM 933 Views
In the AoL... - 20/01/2010 04:49:24 PM 997 Views
Re: In the AoL... - 20/01/2010 07:17:55 PM 787 Views
I was thinking this too - 20/01/2010 07:18:19 PM 951 Views
Still seems like two oaths, to me, due to the "and" ... - 20/01/2010 07:27:03 PM 818 Views
The "and" means nothing... - 20/01/2010 08:01:27 PM 770 Views
Re: Good find, I had forgotten about that quote ... - 21/01/2010 05:24:18 AM 1139 Views
I like it, mainly because it points to Mesaana being bested by Egwene in T'A'R - 21/01/2010 04:26:34 PM 797 Views
Re: Mesaana and defeating the Oath Rod - 20/01/2010 04:11:37 AM 932 Views
Re: Mesaana and defeating the Oath Rod - 20/01/2010 07:28:39 AM 870 Views
It can't be that easy ... - 20/01/2010 02:51:47 PM 873 Views

Reply to Message