Active Users:983 Time:15/12/2025 08:55:32 PM
You are indeed right Etzel Send a noteboard - 22/03/2010 09:35:28 AM
Ok a big argument about his possible killer is the speed to kill a channeler thing...

I have a problem here. Many seem to think that a channeler is like a freakin god. It's just not that way. Think how many asha'man dropped to aiel spears coming out of the gateways. These dude were ready for combat. Asmodean was not, he was opening a door to get some damn wine. on top of that he hesitated because of the shock of knowing his killer. So really any person knowing how to use a knife could have done it. disagree? perhaps because of the issue with needing to be killed ultra fast, words still in the air when death took him and all that? well a knife across the throat can do that, even a two rivers bumkin could have been the killer.

My point with this post? If theories are going to be properly sifted through we should at least use the proper criteria.


Many people wrongly believe that only a channeler could have killed Asmo, while - as it is pointed out and shown several times in the series - the key for a non-channeler to kill a channeler is simply surprise and speed. RJ even stated that Fain would have killed Asmo, if he had been there. And as most know, Fain isn't a channeler..

PS it cant be balefire. if the words were still in the air when death took him it could NOT be balefire. The weave would have erased the words before they ever happened even the smallest amount possible. :p


Balefire can't be the weapon, because RJ said that the DO couldn't transmigrate Asmo because of how and where he died. Even Moiraine's weak balefire could prevent the DO from transmigrating Be'lal. Therefore it simply makes no sense that an even stronger channeler balefired Asmo, but the DO still could have transmigrated him (apparently if he hadn't died in Caemlyn, which also doesn't make much sense).
This message last edited by Etzel on 22/03/2010 at 10:11:25 AM
Reply to message
Asmodeans killer. - 21/03/2010 11:20:18 PM 1250 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 21/03/2010 11:51:14 PM 738 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 22/03/2010 12:01:33 AM 619 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 22/03/2010 12:27:33 AM 857 Views
Not how I learned about it. - 22/03/2010 12:46:10 AM 619 Views
Well we're not really just talking about any channeler. - 22/03/2010 12:36:53 AM 647 Views
bad examples - 22/03/2010 03:08:10 AM 634 Views
Well everyone knows - 22/03/2010 06:21:16 AM 594 Views
You are indeed right - 22/03/2010 09:35:28 AM 572 Views
Channelers aren't gods, but it only takes moments or seconds to weave for experienced channelers - 22/03/2010 02:23:02 PM 599 Views
Rand himself says... - 22/03/2010 02:47:16 PM 620 Views
Re: Rand himself says... - 22/03/2010 03:18:29 PM 564 Views
However... - 22/03/2010 03:33:50 PM 575 Views
Re: However... - 22/03/2010 04:48:08 PM 578 Views
As I always said... - 23/03/2010 09:10:14 AM 513 Views
I think Fain would be more likely. - 23/03/2010 01:48:06 PM 528 Views
Fain was always just a crackpot candidate, but RJ has ruled him out as a suspect anyway. - 23/03/2010 02:24:55 PM 559 Views
But souls have never been said to be destroyed in T'A'R - 23/03/2010 03:37:22 PM 583 Views
I think many readers would agree with your second point... - 23/03/2010 04:14:14 PM 566 Views
Re: I think many readers would agree with your second point... - 24/03/2010 12:10:14 AM 558 Views
Bashere also didn't give him a warning. - 22/03/2010 05:51:58 PM 581 Views
Rand also saw Bashere's weapon before. *NM* - 23/03/2010 09:03:31 AM 236 Views
Re: Asmodeans killer. - 29/03/2010 11:19:43 PM 528 Views
Criteria - 08/04/2010 12:51:27 AM 520 Views
Re: Criteria - 11/05/2010 01:27:55 AM 562 Views
It was Nick cave! - 19/04/2010 10:40:44 AM 717 Views
One possibility you dont mention - 11/05/2010 01:23:26 AM 568 Views
Re: One possibility you dont mention - 11/05/2010 11:02:34 AM 559 Views
IMO... - 11/05/2010 11:31:02 AM 563 Views
Re: One possibility you dont mention - 14/05/2010 12:37:19 AM 551 Views
Re: One possibility you dont mention - 15/05/2010 09:56:28 PM 523 Views

Reply to Message