Active Users:505 Time:28/10/2026 10:53:57 AM
If you don't mind a few grammatical corrections of your swearing... Legolas Send a noteboard - 20/11/2010 05:42:57 PM
The way you've written it you kind of have two reflexive pronouns - the "vas-tu" and then the s' (which should be more specific anyway, te instead of se). And then enculer should be an infinitive, not a past participle. Hence, "Vas te faire enculer" (and since the "te" is a reflexive pronoun and not a subject, it can never be "tu" ). The hyphen is not required there, for the same reason, but I'm not sure if writing it is actually wrong.
Your review of the translation and its myriad pitfalls led me to the previous message, which was a lamentation of my inability to find Madame Bovary in hardcover for, as I said, "less than $100", which led to a further internet search, which led to the discovery of a Pleiade edition for only $80, which led to a purchase. I had vowed to not buy more books for some time. Now I find myself casting around and wondering how often to buy the damn editions in order to supplement my library with suitable editions of Camus, Sartre, Stendhal and Hugo.

"Only" eighty dollars? That had better be Flaubert's entire oeuvre, for that price... of course if you're gonna order from Amazon France to the US, it's true a single massively expensive order would ultimately cost less than buying them one at a time.
This message last edited by Legolas on 20/11/2010 at 05:43:16 PM
Reply to message
Julian Barnes on translation - 18/11/2010 05:49:37 PM 1237 Views
That was a long article. - 19/11/2010 07:05:12 PM 789 Views
Re: That was a long article. - 19/11/2010 09:59:24 PM 773 Views
Yeah, I think English translations on average are better than those in smaller languages. - 19/11/2010 10:16:44 PM 915 Views
Wow - 20/11/2010 10:45:08 AM 960 Views
Traddutore, traditore - 20/11/2010 12:36:10 PM 886 Views
On balance, I'm glad I read the Steegmuller translation when I read the novel. - 20/11/2010 05:14:42 PM 722 Views
Vas-tu faire s’enculée, Camille! - 20/11/2010 05:26:08 PM 810 Views
If you don't mind a few grammatical corrections of your swearing... - 20/11/2010 05:42:57 PM 835 Views
It was a quick and dirty rendering - 20/11/2010 05:53:13 PM 754 Views
Apparently so, with the use of "enculer" - 20/11/2010 07:12:24 PM 776 Views
Actually, yes, it is The Temptation of St. Anthony - 20/11/2010 08:43:08 PM 857 Views
And I didn't order from France. It's a US-based company that I bought it from. *NM* - 20/11/2010 05:54:55 PM 340 Views
Oh, that'd cut down on delivery costs a fair bit, then. *NM* - 20/11/2010 06:01:46 PM 338 Views
Yes, it did. - 20/11/2010 08:45:13 PM 748 Views
I love Pleiade editions - 21/11/2010 12:14:14 AM 760 Views
How tall are they, out of curiosity? - 21/11/2010 12:50:57 AM 895 Views
Not tall - 21/11/2010 09:59:55 AM 791 Views
I got my books today. - 23/11/2010 05:38:20 AM 998 Views
Re: I got my books today. - 23/11/2010 10:33:10 AM 816 Views
Regardless, if Pleiade is the best France has to offer, their book industry is awful. - 23/11/2010 07:17:13 PM 1056 Views
Let me guess... - 23/11/2010 07:46:41 PM 752 Views
No. I don't think he's been released in a Pleiade edition. - 23/11/2010 07:49:05 PM 775 Views
Re: Oh Authorial intent. - 21/11/2010 02:07:27 AM 889 Views
Like hell it's about authorial intent. - 21/11/2010 05:40:22 AM 807 Views
Re: I didn't even read it, I guessed based on the author's initials. - 21/11/2010 01:37:40 PM 1003 Views
So I take it you missed the whole part about Nabokov's translation of Eugene Onegin. - 21/11/2010 03:28:14 PM 755 Views
Re: Yes, I missed all of that. Such a conclusion clearly follows from my previous response. *NM* - 21/11/2010 03:57:16 PM 427 Views
Actually it does. Your responses are just cheap tricks, not discussions. *NM* - 21/11/2010 04:44:21 PM 345 Views
Re: Cheap tricks? - 21/11/2010 10:45:39 PM 851 Views
Barnes' article has little to do with authorial intent - 21/11/2010 11:37:25 PM 794 Views
Why didn't you translate je ne sais quoi? - 21/11/2010 11:46:23 PM 851 Views
Because I didn't feel like it? - 22/11/2010 01:14:31 AM 797 Views
Well, I think you started the snarky replies. - 21/11/2010 11:42:33 PM 770 Views

Reply to Message