Active Users:511 Time:28/10/2026 10:52:41 AM
Barnes' article has little to do with authorial intent Larry Send a noteboard - 21/11/2010 11:37:25 PM
Honestly, that's not my intention. I had actually typed out a long response to your first reply, before realizing that you seemed to be having your cake and eating it too. Or else your subject header was just flashy advertising. To me it felt like with that response and your "you must not have read..." you were leading and then following with an insult. Furthermore, you didn't even respond to my reply. Yes, I think the article has to do with authorial intent. Yes, I read the section on Nabokov's translation of the poem I've never heard of.

I'm not interested in the usual snarky back-and-forth replies, a narrative which this seems to be following. You'll excuse me (or not) for being confused when you said "to hell it has to do with authorial intent" and then said that it didn't have to do with just authorial intent. Those are two entirely opposite stances.


On the other hand, it has a lot to do with those moments of je ne sais quoi in which something that is embedded within one language cause all sorts of difficulties in rendering it in another language. That is what Barnes discusses in depth for the vast majority of his review. Authorial intent fades in the background when there are things in the Text that just cannot be rendered as precisely in a translation. That was pretty much the point of the section dealing with Nabokov's infamous "translation." His effort there was not as much of a translatio as it was a perversion of such.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Julian Barnes on translation - 18/11/2010 05:49:37 PM 1236 Views
That was a long article. - 19/11/2010 07:05:12 PM 789 Views
Re: That was a long article. - 19/11/2010 09:59:24 PM 772 Views
Yeah, I think English translations on average are better than those in smaller languages. - 19/11/2010 10:16:44 PM 914 Views
Wow - 20/11/2010 10:45:08 AM 959 Views
Traddutore, traditore - 20/11/2010 12:36:10 PM 886 Views
On balance, I'm glad I read the Steegmuller translation when I read the novel. - 20/11/2010 05:14:42 PM 722 Views
Vas-tu faire s’enculée, Camille! - 20/11/2010 05:26:08 PM 809 Views
If you don't mind a few grammatical corrections of your swearing... - 20/11/2010 05:42:57 PM 834 Views
It was a quick and dirty rendering - 20/11/2010 05:53:13 PM 754 Views
Apparently so, with the use of "enculer" - 20/11/2010 07:12:24 PM 776 Views
Actually, yes, it is The Temptation of St. Anthony - 20/11/2010 08:43:08 PM 857 Views
And I didn't order from France. It's a US-based company that I bought it from. *NM* - 20/11/2010 05:54:55 PM 340 Views
Oh, that'd cut down on delivery costs a fair bit, then. *NM* - 20/11/2010 06:01:46 PM 337 Views
Yes, it did. - 20/11/2010 08:45:13 PM 748 Views
I love Pleiade editions - 21/11/2010 12:14:14 AM 760 Views
How tall are they, out of curiosity? - 21/11/2010 12:50:57 AM 895 Views
Not tall - 21/11/2010 09:59:55 AM 791 Views
I got my books today. - 23/11/2010 05:38:20 AM 998 Views
Re: I got my books today. - 23/11/2010 10:33:10 AM 815 Views
Regardless, if Pleiade is the best France has to offer, their book industry is awful. - 23/11/2010 07:17:13 PM 1056 Views
Let me guess... - 23/11/2010 07:46:41 PM 752 Views
No. I don't think he's been released in a Pleiade edition. - 23/11/2010 07:49:05 PM 774 Views
Re: Oh Authorial intent. - 21/11/2010 02:07:27 AM 889 Views
Like hell it's about authorial intent. - 21/11/2010 05:40:22 AM 806 Views
Re: I didn't even read it, I guessed based on the author's initials. - 21/11/2010 01:37:40 PM 1003 Views
So I take it you missed the whole part about Nabokov's translation of Eugene Onegin. - 21/11/2010 03:28:14 PM 755 Views
Re: Yes, I missed all of that. Such a conclusion clearly follows from my previous response. *NM* - 21/11/2010 03:57:16 PM 427 Views
Actually it does. Your responses are just cheap tricks, not discussions. *NM* - 21/11/2010 04:44:21 PM 345 Views
Re: Cheap tricks? - 21/11/2010 10:45:39 PM 851 Views
Barnes' article has little to do with authorial intent - 21/11/2010 11:37:25 PM 794 Views
Why didn't you translate je ne sais quoi? - 21/11/2010 11:46:23 PM 850 Views
Because I didn't feel like it? - 22/11/2010 01:14:31 AM 797 Views
Well, I think you started the snarky replies. - 21/11/2010 11:42:33 PM 769 Views

Reply to Message