Active Users:2148 Time:01/05/2026 12:15:58 AM
The Targaryens are used to incestuous marriages. Legolas Send a noteboard - 17/07/2011 07:48:12 PM
There's no reason for Doran not to offer Arianne to Aegon. After all, the initial plan was for Arianne to marry Viserys. Doran should have no objection to the Dany-Quentyn match happening later as a consolidation of the Targ-Martell alliance that he can quickly set up this way.

The Martells are not. Arianne and Aegon are full cousins, Doran might balk at that alright.
Reply to message
Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 16/07/2011 02:34:59 AM 1442 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 16/07/2011 02:28:33 PM 985 Views
I thought Tarly was in the Griff's pocket... - 16/07/2011 04:58:58 PM 983 Views
I don't think so. - 16/07/2011 07:40:53 PM 949 Views
Those are barely reasons... - 17/07/2011 03:08:23 AM 974 Views
Will the Martells refuse Elia's son for a stranger who may or may not marry Quentyn? - 17/07/2011 02:32:00 AM 1517 Views
I think it depends... - 17/07/2011 03:02:48 AM 922 Views
The Targaryens are used to incestuous marriages. - 17/07/2011 07:48:12 PM 890 Views
I don't think that will matter... - 18/07/2011 05:18:17 AM 922 Views
King's Landing has a hostage though. - 18/07/2011 12:16:21 AM 820 Views
She seems like a very feeble hostage though... - 18/07/2011 02:27:15 AM 884 Views
very interesting - 17/07/2011 12:16:10 AM 1266 Views
Sandor's dead? - 17/07/2011 02:24:23 AM 887 Views
A bit of confusion... - 17/07/2011 08:53:54 AM 882 Views
Re: A bit of confusion... - 18/07/2011 12:20:12 AM 837 Views
Ah, okay. Thanks for clearing that up! *NM* - 18/07/2011 02:21:14 AM 417 Views
If we're going there then we might as well throw Rhaegar in the mix... - 17/07/2011 05:49:37 PM 861 Views
Re: Sandor's dead? - 19/07/2011 08:50:13 PM 996 Views
Re: very interesting - 17/07/2011 03:01:06 AM 1152 Views
Re: very interesting - 19/07/2011 09:24:49 PM 1290 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 17/07/2011 04:07:30 AM 1064 Views

Reply to Message