Active Users:698 Time:15/12/2025 10:49:34 AM
The Targaryens are used to incestuous marriages. Legolas Send a noteboard - 17/07/2011 07:48:12 PM
There's no reason for Doran not to offer Arianne to Aegon. After all, the initial plan was for Arianne to marry Viserys. Doran should have no objection to the Dany-Quentyn match happening later as a consolidation of the Targ-Martell alliance that he can quickly set up this way.

The Martells are not. Arianne and Aegon are full cousins, Doran might balk at that alright.
Reply to message
Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 16/07/2011 02:34:59 AM 1382 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 16/07/2011 02:28:33 PM 918 Views
I thought Tarly was in the Griff's pocket... - 16/07/2011 04:58:58 PM 918 Views
I don't think so. - 16/07/2011 07:40:53 PM 892 Views
Those are barely reasons... - 17/07/2011 03:08:23 AM 915 Views
Will the Martells refuse Elia's son for a stranger who may or may not marry Quentyn? - 17/07/2011 02:32:00 AM 1449 Views
I think it depends... - 17/07/2011 03:02:48 AM 869 Views
The Targaryens are used to incestuous marriages. - 17/07/2011 07:48:12 PM 836 Views
I don't think that will matter... - 18/07/2011 05:18:17 AM 864 Views
King's Landing has a hostage though. - 18/07/2011 12:16:21 AM 764 Views
She seems like a very feeble hostage though... - 18/07/2011 02:27:15 AM 831 Views
very interesting - 17/07/2011 12:16:10 AM 1207 Views
Sandor's dead? - 17/07/2011 02:24:23 AM 832 Views
A bit of confusion... - 17/07/2011 08:53:54 AM 829 Views
Re: A bit of confusion... - 18/07/2011 12:20:12 AM 784 Views
Ah, okay. Thanks for clearing that up! *NM* - 18/07/2011 02:21:14 AM 394 Views
If we're going there then we might as well throw Rhaegar in the mix... - 17/07/2011 05:49:37 PM 805 Views
Re: Sandor's dead? - 19/07/2011 08:50:13 PM 937 Views
Re: very interesting - 17/07/2011 03:01:06 AM 1104 Views
Re: very interesting - 19/07/2011 09:24:49 PM 1226 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Dance With Dragons (spoilers) - 17/07/2011 04:07:30 AM 1005 Views

Reply to Message