Active Users:362 Time:01/05/2025 12:45:59 PM
Re: Sometimes, but not usually Camilla Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM
Right now I'm reading two books. I try to focus on one because if I don't do that, I will end up in a situation where I haven't read anything the whole way through. Sometimes I stop reading a particular book for a month or more and put it back on the shelf with the bookmark still in it. There are about three books like that on my shelves right now. I'll finish them. The reasons I haven't finished them? Simple: one is a two-volume religious work, one is about the Russian mafia and ultimately gets depressing when read for too long and one is written in Middle English so I don't read it fast or like to read it at one sitting (I've been reading the Canterbury Tales in Middle English for some time now, one story at a time).



Sounds sensible. Most of my pending books are also either theory or long works that are unrelated to what I should be doing.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 1823 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1519 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1329 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1479 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1435 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1465 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1408 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1447 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1423 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1392 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1450 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1220 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1353 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1400 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1442 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1315 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1385 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1320 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1420 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1402 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1293 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1360 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1288 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1445 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1285 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1408 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1353 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1362 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1325 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1302 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1289 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1355 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1388 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 1806 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1377 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1439 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1278 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1386 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1334 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1341 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1339 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 686 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1329 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1367 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1402 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1372 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1406 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1397 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1230 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1385 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1304 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1381 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1430 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1343 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1298 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1333 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 570 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1246 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1229 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1314 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1229 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1299 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1451 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1211 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1566 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1713 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1487 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1373 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1365 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 670 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1308 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1412 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1435 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1250 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1211 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1250 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1421 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1350 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1227 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1313 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1381 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1493 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1263 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1393 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1330 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1283 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1356 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1323 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1368 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1396 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1356 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1542 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1353 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1462 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1351 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1402 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1456 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1308 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1205 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1477 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1405 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1290 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1181 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1412 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1316 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1390 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1460 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1389 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1449 Views

Reply to Message