Well, there was that South Carolina author who wrote some extensions of a Texas author's famous short stories involving a certain barbarian, yet he seemed to have done well for himself. Would you have slapped that South Carolina author as well, if you hadn't read what else he had produced? 

Nah. I don't care about Conan. There would have been other reasons for slapping RJ. I only care here because Adams is a treasure and they are prostituting him.
Of course, I didn't think Adams' last few stories were all that great, so I'm curious to see if there's any improvement here
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
- 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
2075 Views
I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
1655 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
1682 Views
Hmm
- 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
1661 Views
Re: Hmm
- 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
1609 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
- 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
1656 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
1507 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
1596 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
- 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
1618 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
- 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
1704 Views
It does sound really good
- 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
1549 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1580 Views
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1580 Views
Highly monogamous
- 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
1582 Views
This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
1612 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
1655 Views
best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
1655 Views
Re: best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
1484 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
1731 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
1571 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
907 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
856 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
- 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
1476 Views
RT stole my post title.
- 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
1697 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
- 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
1607 Views
Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
1639 Views
Re: Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
1674 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1451 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1451 Views
Re:
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1449 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1449 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
1497 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
1675 Views
That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1614 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1614 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1460 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1460 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
- 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
1586 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
- 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
1581 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
- 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
1769 Views
where?
- 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
1494 Views
Here
- 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
1663 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
- 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
1581 Views



