Active Users:378 Time:16/09/2026 02:16:11 AM
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time Mad Cow Bomber Send a noteboard - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM
More than that and it just gets confusing, I think. Right now I'm reading a book called "The Lost World of Genesis One", which is an examination of the book of Genesis and why it can't be read as a science textbook like some folks like to. Very good book. After that is "Slouching Towards Bethlehem", a collection of essays by Joan Didion.



That first one sounds intriguing. Does it have a religious outlook, or is it academic?


It is somewhat religious, but the author does spend some good time explaining why more religiously narrow interpretations (such as the six-day view, among others) are not appropriate ways to interpret the Genesis text, and why his view is not incompatible with modern science. He also compares the Genesis text to other contemporary creation texts, such as those from Babylon and Egypt. If you're a Christian already, and are as tired of the creation/evolution debate as I am, I would definitely recommend it.
"The rent we pay for the little space we occupy on earth is the service we render to others."
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 2091 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1838 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1572 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1783 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1668 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1791 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1673 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1707 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1678 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1634 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1704 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1485 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1672 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1658 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1791 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1595 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1631 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1575 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1713 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1694 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1529 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1616 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1542 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1704 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1543 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1657 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1611 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1636 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1596 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1577 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1563 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1640 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1653 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 2070 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1641 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1728 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1565 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1673 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1560 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1615 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1593 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 807 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1599 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1632 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1670 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1639 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1676 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1676 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1508 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1643 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1589 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1681 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1751 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1587 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1541 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1586 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 691 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1490 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1485 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1583 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1447 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1544 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1720 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1497 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1778 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1965 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1759 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1636 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1620 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 796 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1586 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1661 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1696 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1475 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1467 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1512 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1698 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1635 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1477 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1614 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1602 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1796 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1518 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1685 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1580 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1558 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1594 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1571 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1616 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1656 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1598 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1786 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1585 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1731 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1604 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1696 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1716 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1573 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1477 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1742 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1681 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1541 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1434 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1694 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1575 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1636 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1721 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1650 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1730 Views

Reply to Message