Active Users:877 Time:31/10/2026 06:23:03 AM
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. Fred Gaidin Send a noteboard - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM
Is that because you get confused when you don't? Or is it because you don't want to read other books when you are into one?


Reading is something I generally do methodically. Focus on one task (or book) until it is completed. All though I didn't mention the cases above, there are occasions when a new book will come out and I'll stop reading one book in favor of the new book. An example of this will likely occur when the new WoT book is released. However, usually when I decide to read a book, it is the one off the shelf that is most appealling to me at the time. If my interest begins to decline, I tell me self that I have to finish it in order to start the next book. Rarely is a book so bad that I feel that I must just get away from it for a while (like in the case of The Redemption of Althalus).
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 2122 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1871 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1620 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1811 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1692 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1820 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1701 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1744 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1707 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1667 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1743 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1511 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1709 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1704 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1825 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1623 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1664 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1599 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1730 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1719 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1553 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1641 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1578 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1726 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1571 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1681 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1649 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1663 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1622 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1619 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1589 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1669 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1674 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 2094 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1665 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1755 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1592 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1704 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1587 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1640 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1622 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 823 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1622 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1660 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1701 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1659 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1704 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1702 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1554 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1667 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1617 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1720 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1780 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1611 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1568 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1605 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 704 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1524 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1516 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1612 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1476 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1575 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1750 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1530 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1803 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 2002 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1790 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1671 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1651 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 817 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1617 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1708 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1720 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1505 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1496 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1545 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1725 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1660 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1510 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1642 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1628 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1831 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1548 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1715 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1618 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1586 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1618 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1599 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1647 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1698 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1616 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1809 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1616 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1756 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1630 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1730 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1760 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1596 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1503 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1766 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1727 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1574 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1468 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1724 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1603 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1665 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1748 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1678 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1762 Views

Reply to Message