Active Users:1047 Time:11/09/2026 03:41:01 AM
There's a lot more to it than that. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 23/01/2012 07:20:30 PM
Writers might have regurgitated elements from Tolkien's works over the years, but they certainly didn't copy his verbose and archaic writing style. And I would argue that there was very little new in his book. It was a collection of myths and legends from ancient cultures, mixed together with different tropes from other cultures, and told in an old style. Compare LotR with other books that came out at the same time and it instantly feels aged.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
1961 Nobel Finalists: J.R.R. Tolkien - 19/01/2012 09:27:46 AM 1268 Views
It's difficult to assess Tolkien's relative merits then 51 years later. - 19/01/2012 02:41:52 PM 870 Views
Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 02:58:00 PM 843 Views
Re: Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 03:34:02 PM 717 Views
Re: Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 03:45:07 PM 829 Views
Yet Jung personally was contemptuous of Joyce - 19/01/2012 06:41:58 PM 697 Views
Tolkein is an excellent example why I usually dismiss literary critics/critiques - 23/01/2012 05:57:51 PM 960 Views
There's a lot more to it than that. - 23/01/2012 07:20:30 PM 802 Views
True - 23/01/2012 07:57:42 PM 800 Views
You can't dismiss his impact, even if you do not like his storytelling. - 23/01/2012 07:40:19 PM 846 Views
Who is dismissing that he influenced millions well after 1961? - 23/01/2012 07:54:27 PM 809 Views
That's an odd argument - 23/01/2012 07:51:49 PM 890 Views
Not really - 23/01/2012 10:35:39 PM 718 Views
Eh... - 24/01/2012 12:40:37 AM 741 Views
Depends on what you see as the point of literature. - 24/01/2012 08:14:07 AM 699 Views
the point of literature. - 24/01/2012 01:30:28 PM 823 Views
NO - 24/01/2012 02:05:11 PM 686 Views
Re: NO - 25/01/2012 02:54:57 PM 680 Views

Reply to Message