I have noticed a tension between the character of Raistlin and the gameworld's absolutist approach toward Good/Neutral/Evil. His character is interesting at times; the writing just dampens it considerably for me. Much of that is likely due to the game origins getting in way of the trilogy's main plot/characterizations.
The game has a nine-part alignment spectrum ranging from 'Lawful Good' to 'Chaotic Evil' and stopping off at intervening points (consisting of Good/Neutral/Evil and Lawful/Neutral/Chaotic). The degree to which players follow this varies (some ignore it, some follow it and award harsh penalties for players who act 'against alignment'
but it does seem to create limitations in the fiction, where the writers seem to be bearing it too much in mind.Raistlin is more interesting in that the character pretty much ignores those rules. Some of the other more successful D&D tie-ins - such as Lynn Abbey's highly revisionist RISE AND FALL OF A DRAGON KING, which presents a not-entirely-condemning portrait of one of the DARK SUN world's biggest villains - are also ones which challenge some of those limitations.
One of Drizzt's problems is that Salvatore writes to his alignment (Chaotic Good) far too rigidly: "He doesn't follow laws but has his own code of honour and Always Does The Right Thing! Whilst being badass!"
Such rules are stupid when trying to develop dynamic characters, but then again, I've never played the game, so it may be different within that context.
Shakespeare this is not, even if I used the Shakespearean sonnet form

Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
This may be one of the most dire reviews you shall ever read
- 09/09/2012 09:12:25 PM
2316 Views
A review of a D&D bestiary could be more dire.
- 09/09/2012 11:29:17 PM
1409 Views
Perhaps
- 09/09/2012 11:50:20 PM
1505 Views
They are popular as they are fun, easy reading books
- 10/09/2012 12:11:24 AM
1494 Views
"Popular", "Fun," and "Easy" doesn't have to be equated with poorly-written
- 10/09/2012 12:16:27 AM
1727 Views
Poorly written by what standard?
- 10/09/2012 12:29:17 AM
1586 Views
By the standards of what I enjoyed as a nine year-old?
- 10/09/2012 01:04:12 AM
1526 Views
So like I said, by the standards of Elitist Literary Snobs
- 11/09/2012 12:03:08 AM
1601 Views
Nice attempt at sophistry, but alas, it fails
- 11/09/2012 12:38:24 AM
1550 Views
Was that meant to make any sense?
- 11/09/2012 01:43:13 AM
1741 Views
Re: Was that meant to make any sense?
- 11/09/2012 01:54:23 AM
1539 Views
I'm with Wibble on this (big surprise)
- 12/09/2012 03:07:53 PM
1625 Views
Heh.
- 12/09/2012 03:43:52 PM
1761 Views
Pretty much so
- 12/09/2012 04:19:35 PM
1719 Views
When did you put up that header?
- 12/09/2012 04:35:20 PM
1544 Views
I didn't put it up
- 12/09/2012 04:51:32 PM
1453 Views
I shall tread lightly so.
- 12/09/2012 06:15:51 PM
1569 Views
- 12/09/2012 07:25:29 PM
1414 Views
- 12/09/2012 07:25:29 PM
1414 Views
Re: Pretty much so
- 12/09/2012 08:50:57 PM
1575 Views
You apparently do not read my blog/reviews much
- 12/09/2012 09:07:18 PM
1597 Views
Actually, I read them almost never
- 13/09/2012 03:07:48 PM
1597 Views
I think my IQ dropped a little bit when I parsed what you said
- 13/09/2012 04:16:21 PM
1577 Views
Yep, your usual rebuttal... *NM*
- 17/09/2012 02:14:56 PM
790 Views
No, not really
- 17/09/2012 06:25:15 PM
1399 Views
Yes, Yes, wrap yourself in arrogance and declare yourself correct until your opposite gets bored...
- 17/09/2012 11:12:17 PM
1695 Views
Don't try to argue with them. They've made their judgments. They are better than you.
- 10/09/2012 09:36:17 PM
1517 Views
Defensive much?
*NM*
- 10/09/2012 10:31:17 PM
837 Views
*NM*
- 10/09/2012 10:31:17 PM
837 Views
Perhaps. It's annoying, because I tend to agree with you guys - you and Tom and Stephen.
- 11/09/2012 02:32:28 AM
1513 Views
The odd thing that there wasn't any belittling on my part -see other response. *NM*
- 11/09/2012 03:17:36 AM
752 Views
For the record, I wasn't trying to be condescending in my response.
- 11/09/2012 05:52:29 PM
1529 Views
He never said you couldn't enjoy it.
- 10/09/2012 11:10:11 PM
1644 Views
He also went on to compare liking the books to having the standards of a nine-year-old.
- 11/09/2012 02:34:18 AM
1508 Views
You didn't read what I said very well then
- 11/09/2012 03:16:21 AM
1502 Views
You're right. In the context of this thread, I'm basically acting like a raving lunatic.
- 11/09/2012 02:48:19 PM
1543 Views
It's not like any of us have ever been innocent 100% of the time
- 11/09/2012 03:49:22 PM
1522 Views
- 11/09/2012 03:49:22 PM
1522 Views
I believe that they were not meant for adults.
- 10/09/2012 12:30:05 AM
1527 Views
Very few of my friends were reading the books; some played the game, though
- 10/09/2012 01:06:07 AM
1499 Views
Basically, both get dubious kudos for trying something new by the dire standards of the day.
- 10/09/2012 11:38:22 PM
1568 Views
Interesting point
- 11/09/2012 12:41:01 AM
1502 Views
Are you aware of the game's alignment rules? Some of the novels struggle with this.
- 12/09/2012 10:58:37 PM
1568 Views
Not aware of it at all until now
- 12/09/2012 11:18:57 PM
1525 Views
How is that possible?
- 12/09/2012 11:28:33 PM
1485 Views
My dad was (and is) influenced by Evangelicals
- 13/09/2012 12:17:36 AM
1420 Views
Wait, so you didn't read the Chronicles first?
- 13/09/2012 02:12:13 PM
1419 Views
No
- 13/09/2012 02:18:03 PM
1481 Views
Chronicles is considerably weaker
- 13/09/2012 11:14:38 PM
1507 Views
Needless to say, once I finish reading the Icewind Dale trilogy, I'm done with D&D
- 14/09/2012 12:38:47 AM
1667 Views
- 14/09/2012 12:38:47 AM
1667 Views
These threads are so much better than the rape threads! *NM*
- 12/09/2012 04:03:01 AM
863 Views
You're just waiting to see if I'll use hexameter in the next one
*NM*
- 12/09/2012 04:32:31 AM
688 Views
*NM*
- 12/09/2012 04:32:31 AM
688 Views
And having now finished Dragonlance: Legends, its very own sonnet
- 13/09/2012 12:31:51 PM
1492 Views
- 13/09/2012 12:31:51 PM
1492 Views
At least you didn't read the Baldur's Gate novelizations
- 14/09/2012 04:29:17 AM
1443 Views
Sssssh!
- 14/09/2012 05:10:19 AM
1493 Views
Baldurs Gate wooooo!
- 14/09/2012 04:13:34 PM
1613 Views
Eh, Star Wars Expanded Universe I could see reading. Some of them are supposed to be good
- 17/09/2012 04:37:05 PM
1864 Views
Is the review dire because of the subject or the sonnet form?
- 14/09/2012 04:24:37 PM
1546 Views
Both
- 14/09/2012 04:36:59 PM
1471 Views
- 14/09/2012 04:36:59 PM
1471 Views
it would be unusual for someone to just randomly pick books like that up
- 14/09/2012 05:05:37 PM
1762 Views
Interesting scenario
- 14/09/2012 10:16:11 PM
1472 Views
