Active Users:512 Time:18/09/2026 04:29:16 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You apparently do not read my blog/reviews much Larry Send a noteboard - 12/09/2012 09:07:18 PM

Considering that I readily admit that I enjoy kitsch and that pro wrestling is certainly that, I would have to say that my standards don't really change when shifting from pro wrestling to book reviewing ;)


Except that whenever you review or speak to a book, if it isn't high literature, you say that it is not a good book. You do not apply the same sort of standards.

Wrestling can be good, simply because people enjoy it. A movie can be bgood, simply because people enjoy it. Twinkies are good because people like them. However, for you, a book/story can never be good simply because people like it...


Because I rarely use the words "good" or "bad" when commenting on stories from a variety of genres, instead preferring to compare strengths and weaknesses without resorting to binary labels. But feel free to read through the hundreds of reviews I've published there since 2007, if you want ;)
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
This may be one of the most dire reviews you shall ever read Larry - 09/09/2012 09:12:25 PM 2496 Views
Certainly one of the most original, you get points for that. Legolas - 09/09/2012 10:39:00 PM 1727 Views
Well... Larry - 09/09/2012 10:57:25 PM 1736 Views
A review of a D&D bestiary could be more dire. Stephen - 09/09/2012 11:29:17 PM 1568 Views
Perhaps Larry - 09/09/2012 11:50:20 PM 1660 Views
Hey now. Owlbears are awesome. lord-of-shadow - 11/09/2012 02:35:28 AM 1925 Views
That page is painful to behold Stephen - 11/09/2012 03:09:29 AM 1667 Views
They are popular as they are fun, easy reading books Wibble - 10/09/2012 12:11:24 AM 1650 Views
"Popular", "Fun," and "Easy" doesn't have to be equated with poorly-written Larry - 10/09/2012 12:16:27 AM 1882 Views
Poorly written by what standard? Wibble - 10/09/2012 12:29:17 AM 1737 Views
By the standards of what I enjoyed as a nine year-old? Larry - 10/09/2012 01:04:12 AM 1712 Views
So like I said, by the standards of Elitist Literary Snobs Wibble - 11/09/2012 12:03:08 AM 1767 Views
Nice attempt at sophistry, but alas, it fails Larry - 11/09/2012 12:38:24 AM 1713 Views
Was that meant to make any sense? Wibble - 11/09/2012 01:43:13 AM 1913 Views
Re: Was that meant to make any sense? Larry - 11/09/2012 01:54:23 AM 1701 Views
I'm with Wibble on this (big surprise) HyogaRott - 12/09/2012 03:07:53 PM 1774 Views
Heh. James - 12/09/2012 03:43:52 PM 1932 Views
Pretty much so Larry - 12/09/2012 04:19:35 PM 1885 Views
When did you put up that header? Stephen - 12/09/2012 04:35:20 PM 1705 Views
I didn't put it up Larry - 12/09/2012 04:51:32 PM 1617 Views
I shall tread lightly so. Stephen - 12/09/2012 06:15:51 PM 1735 Views
Larry - 12/09/2012 07:25:29 PM 1593 Views
+6 health? What game are you playing? Tom - 12/09/2012 07:52:52 PM 1634 Views
The Game of Life? Larry - 12/09/2012 08:23:53 PM 1684 Views
Re: Pretty much so HyogaRott - 12/09/2012 08:50:57 PM 1726 Views
You apparently do not read my blog/reviews much Larry - 12/09/2012 09:07:18 PM 1748 Views
Actually, I read them almost never HyogaRott - 13/09/2012 03:07:48 PM 1752 Views
I think my IQ dropped a little bit when I parsed what you said Larry - 13/09/2012 04:16:21 PM 1728 Views
Yep, your usual rebuttal... *NM* HyogaRott - 17/09/2012 02:14:56 PM 878 Views
No, not really Larry - 17/09/2012 06:25:15 PM 1568 Views
Yes, Yes, wrap yourself in arrogance and declare yourself correct until your opposite gets bored... HyogaRott - 17/09/2012 11:12:17 PM 1846 Views
Nah, I just wipe my ass with arrogance Larry - 18/09/2012 12:23:44 AM 2089 Views
The last word with me is rather difficult to obtain HyogaRott - 18/09/2012 02:48:03 PM 1667 Views
Don't try to argue with them. They've made their judgments. They are better than you. lord-of-shadow - 10/09/2012 09:36:17 PM 1669 Views
Defensive much? *NM* Larry - 10/09/2012 10:31:17 PM 910 Views
Perhaps. It's annoying, because I tend to agree with you guys - you and Tom and Stephen. lord-of-shadow - 11/09/2012 02:32:28 AM 1695 Views
The odd thing that there wasn't any belittling on my part -see other response. *NM* Larry - 11/09/2012 03:17:36 AM 842 Views
For the record, I wasn't trying to be condescending in my response. Tom - 11/09/2012 05:52:29 PM 1721 Views
He never said you couldn't enjoy it. Stephen - 10/09/2012 11:10:11 PM 1814 Views
Indeed Larry - 10/09/2012 11:17:20 PM 1656 Views
But they aren't. Wibble - 10/09/2012 11:48:14 PM 1698 Views
Prove it. *NM* Stephen - 11/09/2012 03:12:17 AM 852 Views
He also went on to compare liking the books to having the standards of a nine-year-old. lord-of-shadow - 11/09/2012 02:34:18 AM 1666 Views
You didn't read what I said very well then Larry - 11/09/2012 03:16:21 AM 1654 Views
You're right. In the context of this thread, I'm basically acting like a raving lunatic. lord-of-shadow - 11/09/2012 02:48:19 PM 1690 Views
It's not like any of us have ever been innocent 100% of the time Larry - 11/09/2012 03:49:22 PM 1671 Views
I believe that they were not meant for adults. Tom - 10/09/2012 12:30:05 AM 1698 Views
Very few of my friends were reading the books; some played the game, though Larry - 10/09/2012 01:06:07 AM 1663 Views
Basically, both get dubious kudos for trying something new by the dire standards of the day. Werthead - 10/09/2012 11:38:22 PM 1735 Views
Interesting point Larry - 11/09/2012 12:41:01 AM 1664 Views
Are you aware of the game's alignment rules? Some of the novels struggle with this. Werthead - 12/09/2012 10:58:37 PM 1722 Views
Not aware of it at all until now Larry - 12/09/2012 11:18:57 PM 1689 Views
How is that possible? Tom - 12/09/2012 11:28:33 PM 1659 Views
My dad was (and is) influenced by Evangelicals Larry - 13/09/2012 12:17:36 AM 1568 Views
Wait, so you didn't read the Chronicles first? Tom - 13/09/2012 02:12:13 PM 1582 Views
No Larry - 13/09/2012 02:18:03 PM 1645 Views
Well, it's sort of like starting Jordan at Lord of Chaos Tom - 13/09/2012 05:18:23 PM 1676 Views
Oddly enough, I started WoT at CoS in November 1997 Larry - 13/09/2012 05:56:04 PM 1587 Views
Chronicles is considerably weaker Werthead - 13/09/2012 11:14:38 PM 1691 Views
Needless to say, once I finish reading the Icewind Dale trilogy, I'm done with D&D Larry - 14/09/2012 12:38:47 AM 1812 Views
12 modules, not 15 Tom - 14/09/2012 02:55:39 PM 1846 Views
These threads are so much better than the rape threads! *NM* Dan - 12/09/2012 04:03:01 AM 945 Views
You're just waiting to see if I'll use hexameter in the next one *NM* Larry - 12/09/2012 04:32:31 AM 786 Views
When do we get to see some alexandrines? *NM* Stephen - 12/09/2012 12:41:29 PM 837 Views
Or quatrains? Larry - 12/09/2012 03:25:13 PM 1571 Views
And having now finished Dragonlance: Legends, its very own sonnet Larry - 13/09/2012 12:31:51 PM 1652 Views
At least you didn't read the Baldur's Gate novelizations beetnemesis - 14/09/2012 04:29:17 AM 1589 Views
Sssssh! Larry - 14/09/2012 05:10:19 AM 1645 Views
People become lesbians for no reason! beetnemesis - 17/09/2012 04:34:20 PM 1514 Views
I think my IQ dropped further upon learning of this Larry - 17/09/2012 06:29:29 PM 1540 Views
Baldurs Gate wooooo! Foxhead - 14/09/2012 04:13:34 PM 1780 Views
Eh, Star Wars Expanded Universe I could see reading. Some of them are supposed to be good beetnemesis - 17/09/2012 04:37:05 PM 2016 Views
Is the review dire because of the subject or the sonnet form? Foxhead - 14/09/2012 04:24:37 PM 1703 Views
Both Larry - 14/09/2012 04:36:59 PM 1614 Views
it would be unusual for someone to just randomly pick books like that up Foxhead - 14/09/2012 05:05:37 PM 1927 Views
Interesting scenario Larry - 14/09/2012 10:16:11 PM 1627 Views
Re: Interesting scenario Foxhead - 15/09/2012 09:55:59 AM 1880 Views
Re: Interesting scenario Larry - 17/09/2012 06:28:57 PM 1535 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes