Active Users:671 Time:18/12/2025 04:23:13 PM
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time Mad Cow Bomber Send a noteboard - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM
More than that and it just gets confusing, I think. Right now I'm reading a book called "The Lost World of Genesis One", which is an examination of the book of Genesis and why it can't be read as a science textbook like some folks like to. Very good book. After that is "Slouching Towards Bethlehem", a collection of essays by Joan Didion.



That first one sounds intriguing. Does it have a religious outlook, or is it academic?


It is somewhat religious, but the author does spend some good time explaining why more religiously narrow interpretations (such as the six-day view, among others) are not appropriate ways to interpret the Genesis text, and why his view is not incompatible with modern science. He also compares the Genesis text to other contemporary creation texts, such as those from Babylon and Egypt. If you're a Christian already, and are as tired of the creation/evolution debate as I am, I would definitely recommend it.
"The rent we pay for the little space we occupy on earth is the service we render to others."
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 1926 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1662 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1432 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1626 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1526 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1631 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1509 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1548 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1516 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1488 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1552 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1328 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1514 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1501 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1631 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1430 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1483 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1422 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1517 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1531 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1390 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1455 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1388 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1549 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1385 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1515 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1457 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1466 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1437 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1416 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1397 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1462 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1495 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 1914 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1478 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1546 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1399 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1497 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1416 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1454 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1443 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 731 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1433 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1474 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1516 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1476 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1511 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1497 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1338 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1483 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1419 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1488 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1558 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1437 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1399 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1438 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 611 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1345 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1338 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1422 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1322 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1399 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1545 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1331 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1652 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1814 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1591 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1485 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1458 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 713 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1406 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1505 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1532 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1333 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1310 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1361 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1530 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1456 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1328 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1429 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1464 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1587 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1365 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1506 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1423 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1387 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1442 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1434 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1460 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1492 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1448 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1645 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1438 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1573 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1453 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1493 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1563 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1409 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1331 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1578 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1514 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1389 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1282 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1534 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1412 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1490 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1559 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1489 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1576 Views

Reply to Message