Active Users:1817 Time:03/05/2026 09:19:08 AM
Re: Sometimes, but not usually Camilla Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM
Right now I'm reading two books. I try to focus on one because if I don't do that, I will end up in a situation where I haven't read anything the whole way through. Sometimes I stop reading a particular book for a month or more and put it back on the shelf with the bookmark still in it. There are about three books like that on my shelves right now. I'll finish them. The reasons I haven't finished them? Simple: one is a two-volume religious work, one is about the Russian mafia and ultimately gets depressing when read for too long and one is written in Middle English so I don't read it fast or like to read it at one sitting (I've been reading the Canterbury Tales in Middle English for some time now, one story at a time).



Sounds sensible. Most of my pending books are also either theory or long works that are unrelated to what I should be doing.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 2009 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1734 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1499 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1703 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1594 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1710 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1595 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1626 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1596 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1560 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1626 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1399 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1601 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1584 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1707 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1505 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1558 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1491 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1621 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1618 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1459 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1540 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1470 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1624 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1459 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1587 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1536 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1555 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1512 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1495 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1475 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1551 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1567 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 1993 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1554 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1637 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1481 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1585 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1480 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1529 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1516 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 762 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1518 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1559 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1594 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1538 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1589 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1592 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1418 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1561 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1510 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1600 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1667 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1512 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1468 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1512 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 644 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1420 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1405 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1503 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1380 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1475 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1642 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1423 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1711 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1890 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1672 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1563 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1539 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 747 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1507 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1584 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1621 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1401 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1383 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1440 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1607 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1558 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1404 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1502 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1529 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1667 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1432 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1599 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1504 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1478 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1520 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1496 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1528 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1579 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1520 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1718 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1508 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1644 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1524 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1576 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1634 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1490 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1405 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1654 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1593 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1465 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1354 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1616 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1495 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1566 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1646 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1575 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1655 Views

Reply to Message