Right now I'm reading two books. I try to focus on one because if I don't do that, I will end up in a situation where I haven't read anything the whole way through. Sometimes I stop reading a particular book for a month or more and put it back on the shelf with the bookmark still in it. There are about three books like that on my shelves right now. I'll finish them. The reasons I haven't finished them? Simple: one is a two-volume religious work, one is about the Russian mafia and ultimately gets depressing when read for too long and one is written in Middle English so I don't read it fast or like to read it at one sitting (I've been reading the Canterbury Tales in Middle English for some time now, one story at a time).
Sounds sensible. Most of my pending books are also either theory or long works that are unrelated to what I should be doing.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
- 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
2039 Views
I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
1620 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
1649 Views
Hmm
- 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
1618 Views
Re: Hmm
- 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
1581 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
- 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
1621 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
1478 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
1563 Views
Sometimes, but not usually
- 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM
1512 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually
- 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM
1498 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
- 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
1577 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
- 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
1671 Views
It does sound really good
- 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
1509 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1537 Views
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1537 Views
Highly monogamous
- 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
1538 Views
This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
1562 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
1614 Views
best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
1613 Views
Re: best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
1444 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
1696 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
1537 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
877 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
825 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
- 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
1449 Views
RT stole my post title.
- 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
1662 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
- 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
1559 Views
Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
1607 Views
Re: Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
1641 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1417 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1417 Views
Re:
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1409 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1409 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
1463 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
1628 Views
That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1579 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1579 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1420 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1420 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
- 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
1534 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
- 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
1553 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
- 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
1708 Views
where?
- 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
1451 Views
Here
- 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
1622 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
- 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
1549 Views



