Active Users:528 Time:19/12/2025 05:07:28 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
They were written thirty years ago, when different standards prevailed. Oh, and for younger readers. lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 12/12/2009 07:00:32 PM
Or maybe less sophisticated ones, I suppose (not there that's anything wrong with a less sophisticated read). Either way, most of us are simply not the target audience for them anymore. Time has magnified their flaws, as does our age as readers.

In the right mindset or situation I could see myself enjoying them again, but I generally prefer to read things that don't require syzygy to be enjoyable.
This message last edited by lord-of-shadow on 12/12/2009 at 07:04:06 PM
Reply to message
Terry Brooks Corporal Crusty - 11/12/2009 04:52:49 AM 981 Views
well, when I was 12 it was great. The Wandering Gambler - 11/12/2009 05:07:53 AM 834 Views
I share your thoughts Dragonsworn - 11/12/2009 02:21:28 PM 1021 Views
I'd tend to agree. Mad Cow Bomber - 11/12/2009 02:22:14 PM 935 Views
he's fun if you're reading the book and doing something else... temeraire - 11/12/2009 05:21:41 PM 859 Views
in 1979 I read Sword of Shannara PhotoJim - 11/12/2009 06:47:22 PM 978 Views
I mildly enjoyed The Sword of Shannara. j-whitt987 - 11/12/2009 07:56:16 PM 873 Views
It's one of the few books I abandoned after starting it. aria - 12/12/2009 12:27:17 PM 782 Views
Nostalgia. johnnymack - 12/12/2009 03:40:02 PM 810 Views
They were written thirty years ago, when different standards prevailed. Oh, and for younger readers. lord-of-shadow - 12/12/2009 07:00:32 PM 781 Views
You totally wrote that post just to use the word syzygy. *NM* Ghavrel - 13/12/2009 04:55:20 AM 323 Views
As others have mentioned, they were okay for their time period. Word and Void is a decent series. *NM* Mossman - 12/12/2009 08:26:20 PM 353 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes