Active Users:323 Time:01/08/2026 06:30:43 PM
They were written thirty years ago, when different standards prevailed. Oh, and for younger readers. lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 12/12/2009 07:00:32 PM
Or maybe less sophisticated ones, I suppose (not there that's anything wrong with a less sophisticated read). Either way, most of us are simply not the target audience for them anymore. Time has magnified their flaws, as does our age as readers.

In the right mindset or situation I could see myself enjoying them again, but I generally prefer to read things that don't require syzygy to be enjoyable.
This message last edited by lord-of-shadow on 12/12/2009 at 07:04:06 PM
Reply to message
Terry Brooks - 11/12/2009 04:52:49 AM 1086 Views
well, when I was 12 it was great. - 11/12/2009 05:07:53 AM 967 Views
I share your thoughts - 11/12/2009 02:21:28 PM 1152 Views
I'd tend to agree. - 11/12/2009 02:22:14 PM 1048 Views
he's fun if you're reading the book and doing something else... - 11/12/2009 05:21:41 PM 969 Views
in 1979 I read Sword of Shannara - 11/12/2009 06:47:22 PM 1092 Views
I mildly enjoyed The Sword of Shannara. - 11/12/2009 07:56:16 PM 1000 Views
It's one of the few books I abandoned after starting it. - 12/12/2009 12:27:17 PM 895 Views
Nostalgia. - 12/12/2009 03:40:02 PM 940 Views
They were written thirty years ago, when different standards prevailed. Oh, and for younger readers. - 12/12/2009 07:00:32 PM 898 Views
You totally wrote that post just to use the word syzygy. *NM* - 13/12/2009 04:55:20 AM 379 Views

Reply to Message