Active Users:331 Time:15/05/2024 11:24:06 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
They were written thirty years ago, when different standards prevailed. Oh, and for younger readers. lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 12/12/2009 07:00:32 PM
Or maybe less sophisticated ones, I suppose (not there that's anything wrong with a less sophisticated read). Either way, most of us are simply not the target audience for them anymore. Time has magnified their flaws, as does our age as readers.

In the right mindset or situation I could see myself enjoying them again, but I generally prefer to read things that don't require syzygy to be enjoyable.
This message last edited by lord-of-shadow on 12/12/2009 at 07:04:06 PM
Reply to message
Terry Brooks Corporal Crusty - 11/12/2009 04:52:49 AM 774 Views
well, when I was 12 it was great. The Wandering Gambler - 11/12/2009 05:07:53 AM 615 Views
I share your thoughts Dragonsworn - 11/12/2009 02:21:28 PM 740 Views
I'd tend to agree. Mad Cow Bomber - 11/12/2009 02:22:14 PM 653 Views
he's fun if you're reading the book and doing something else... temeraire - 11/12/2009 05:21:41 PM 618 Views
in 1979 I read Sword of Shannara PhotoJim - 11/12/2009 06:47:22 PM 739 Views
I mildly enjoyed The Sword of Shannara. j-whitt987 - 11/12/2009 07:56:16 PM 636 Views
It's one of the few books I abandoned after starting it. aria - 12/12/2009 12:27:17 PM 581 Views
Nostalgia. johnnymack - 12/12/2009 03:40:02 PM 599 Views
They were written thirty years ago, when different standards prevailed. Oh, and for younger readers. lord-of-shadow - 12/12/2009 07:00:32 PM 571 Views
You totally wrote that post just to use the word syzygy. *NM* Ghavrel - 13/12/2009 04:55:20 AM 238 Views
As others have mentioned, they were okay for their time period. Word and Void is a decent series. *NM* Mossman - 12/12/2009 08:26:20 PM 262 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes