Active Users:791 Time:16/10/2025 04:33:00 AM
Yes. Cockatiel of Doom Send a noteboard - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM

The Ackroyd book, wasn't it?


It was.

I haven't read Bayard's take on that.


He does a similar thing. Murderer as named in the story is not actual murderer, etc. I thought it was fun, even if it was hard to take seriously.


He loses me when he start talking about independent action from characters and deep animosity on the part of the author, but his theory otherwise is sound.


I had trouble with the whole "author does not know what his characters are really doing" type of thing. Bit odd. But interesting all the same.
Taking a break from being Ella

Reply to message
Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 05:20:09 AM 898 Views
Re: Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 09:12:23 AM 716 Views
I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 12/03/2010 11:55:09 PM 637 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 14/03/2010 10:56:54 AM 709 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:37:35 PM 685 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:39:13 PM 660 Views
Yes. - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM 707 Views
Re: Yes. - 17/03/2010 07:53:38 PM 596 Views
I don't mind either way. - 12/03/2010 10:18:03 AM 693 Views
Your face is an unreliable horse! - 12/03/2010 10:25:32 AM 708 Views
I think it's fairly logical that genre fiction doesn't employ it as often. - 12/03/2010 01:21:06 PM 875 Views
Well, isn't Erikson notable for his unreliable POVs? - 14/03/2010 12:57:25 AM 691 Views
Hm. Yeigh? - 12/03/2010 05:15:41 PM 763 Views
I like it when they are well written - 15/03/2010 08:44:02 AM 991 Views
Like anything else it is good when done right - 15/03/2010 10:32:48 PM 787 Views
I think because of our cynical nature - 19/03/2010 06:58:05 AM 661 Views

Reply to Message