Active Users:590 Time:13/11/2026 03:03:22 AM
Yes. Cockatiel of Doom Send a noteboard - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM

The Ackroyd book, wasn't it?


It was.

I haven't read Bayard's take on that.


He does a similar thing. Murderer as named in the story is not actual murderer, etc. I thought it was fun, even if it was hard to take seriously.


He loses me when he start talking about independent action from characters and deep animosity on the part of the author, but his theory otherwise is sound.


I had trouble with the whole "author does not know what his characters are really doing" type of thing. Bit odd. But interesting all the same.
Taking a break from being Ella

Reply to message
Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 05:20:09 AM 1114 Views
Re: Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 09:12:23 AM 895 Views
I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 12/03/2010 11:55:09 PM 822 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 14/03/2010 10:56:54 AM 876 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:37:35 PM 858 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:39:13 PM 826 Views
Yes. - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM 873 Views
Re: Yes. - 17/03/2010 07:53:38 PM 776 Views
I don't mind either way. - 12/03/2010 10:18:03 AM 867 Views
Your face is an unreliable horse! - 12/03/2010 10:25:32 AM 908 Views
I think it's fairly logical that genre fiction doesn't employ it as often. - 12/03/2010 01:21:06 PM 1071 Views
Well, isn't Erikson notable for his unreliable POVs? - 14/03/2010 12:57:25 AM 847 Views
Hm. Yeigh? - 12/03/2010 05:15:41 PM 942 Views
I like it when they are well written - 15/03/2010 08:44:02 AM 1203 Views
Like anything else it is good when done right - 15/03/2010 10:32:48 PM 980 Views
I think because of our cynical nature - 19/03/2010 06:58:05 AM 873 Views

Reply to Message