Active Users:409 Time:02/05/2025 03:54:37 AM
Purim may or may not refer to a historic event. Even if it does, Haman was not likely an Arab. Tom Send a noteboard - 07/06/2010 12:00:05 AM
If the truth be told, most of the Arab-speaking world aren't Arabs. They may be called Arabs, yes, but they aren't. Mesopotamia is inhabited by the descendants of the Sumerians, Babylonians and Assyrians. Canaan (I will choose the most neutral term for the land of Syria that is, roughly speaking, south of the Litani) is inhabited by the same people that inhabited it in antiquity. So is Egypt, and so is Turkey.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Jacqueline Rose on the Dreyfus affair and related problems, in the LRB - 06/06/2010 11:28:14 AM 1150 Views
What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:48:16 PM 940 Views
Re: What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:56:32 PM 863 Views
*remains amused at the suggestion of the Dreyfus Affairs "pertinence" to "current" events* - 06/06/2010 05:14:23 PM 874 Views
I agree in part and (strongly) disagree in part. - 06/06/2010 05:40:26 PM 841 Views
"If it's an eternal struggle, how could there ever be a solution or a peace?" - 06/06/2010 06:20:39 PM 906 Views
Purim may or may not refer to a historic event. Even if it does, Haman was not likely an Arab. - 07/06/2010 12:00:05 AM 759 Views
I second your main point. - 07/06/2010 12:09:42 AM 774 Views
I don't discount that there is Arab blood in many or even most "Arabs". - 07/06/2010 12:18:32 AM 755 Views
Okay, fair enough then. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:45:19 AM 335 Views
The holiday is centuries old and real, regardless. - 07/06/2010 12:28:59 AM 848 Views
You're still missing the major point here. - 07/06/2010 12:44:08 AM 760 Views
That seems a rather limited view of history. - 07/06/2010 01:10:11 AM 859 Views
What the Hell are you going on about? - 07/06/2010 04:08:19 AM 827 Views
Oooh - 07/06/2010 11:07:43 AM 662 Views
Yeah, to whom was the claim on that land given? - 07/06/2010 10:35:42 PM 785 Views
jeez Joel... - 07/06/2010 04:24:47 AM 805 Views
No, the Persians are not Arabs. - 07/06/2010 10:09:47 PM 940 Views
I (coincidentally) stumbled across those infamous hadith passages about Jews the other day. - 07/06/2010 09:41:39 AM 847 Views
So? - 07/06/2010 10:50:49 PM 824 Views
So the relevance of apocalyptic passages is close to zero. - 07/06/2010 11:55:05 PM 786 Views
Not to mention - 08/06/2010 09:09:27 AM 694 Views
Then why are they canon? - 08/06/2010 06:25:09 PM 990 Views
are you claiming that people would pull some things out of holy text and ignore the rest? - 08/06/2010 12:16:41 PM 847 Views
*NM* - 08/06/2010 01:16:13 PM 328 Views
well, for me this just proves why we are not supposed to live among non-Jews - 06/06/2010 11:39:45 PM 943 Views
how so? - 06/06/2010 11:41:18 PM 707 Views
It reminds me of what I kept thinking as I read it. - 07/06/2010 12:51:36 AM 741 Views
couldn't get past the part where anyone who opposes Obama is a racist *NM* - 08/06/2010 01:40:07 AM 505 Views
You hallucinated? *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:39:37 AM 379 Views
No, that would've been one of the places where she should've shut up. *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:58:11 AM 316 Views
No - 08/06/2010 09:08:04 AM 727 Views
I think he's not talking about that bit, but about the very first paragraph. - 08/06/2010 09:30:21 AM 857 Views
If there was more I didn't get far enough to hear it - 08/06/2010 12:09:47 PM 710 Views
That's the problem with the speech - the large majority of what she had to say was worthwhile. - 08/06/2010 01:15:39 PM 764 Views
The problem is blatant bias - 08/06/2010 02:24:57 PM 749 Views

Reply to Message