Active Users:1115 Time:16/12/2025 12:43:44 AM
Purim may or may not refer to a historic event. Even if it does, Haman was not likely an Arab. Tom Send a noteboard - 07/06/2010 12:00:05 AM
If the truth be told, most of the Arab-speaking world aren't Arabs. They may be called Arabs, yes, but they aren't. Mesopotamia is inhabited by the descendants of the Sumerians, Babylonians and Assyrians. Canaan (I will choose the most neutral term for the land of Syria that is, roughly speaking, south of the Litani) is inhabited by the same people that inhabited it in antiquity. So is Egypt, and so is Turkey.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Jacqueline Rose on the Dreyfus affair and related problems, in the LRB - 06/06/2010 11:28:14 AM 1269 Views
What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:48:16 PM 1053 Views
Re: What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:56:32 PM 989 Views
*remains amused at the suggestion of the Dreyfus Affairs "pertinence" to "current" events* - 06/06/2010 05:14:23 PM 984 Views
I agree in part and (strongly) disagree in part. - 06/06/2010 05:40:26 PM 958 Views
"If it's an eternal struggle, how could there ever be a solution or a peace?" - 06/06/2010 06:20:39 PM 1018 Views
Purim may or may not refer to a historic event. Even if it does, Haman was not likely an Arab. - 07/06/2010 12:00:05 AM 877 Views
I second your main point. - 07/06/2010 12:09:42 AM 926 Views
I don't discount that there is Arab blood in many or even most "Arabs". - 07/06/2010 12:18:32 AM 855 Views
Okay, fair enough then. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:45:19 AM 401 Views
The holiday is centuries old and real, regardless. - 07/06/2010 12:28:59 AM 966 Views
You're still missing the major point here. - 07/06/2010 12:44:08 AM 853 Views
That seems a rather limited view of history. - 07/06/2010 01:10:11 AM 952 Views
What the Hell are you going on about? - 07/06/2010 04:08:19 AM 934 Views
Oooh - 07/06/2010 11:07:43 AM 770 Views
Yeah, to whom was the claim on that land given? - 07/06/2010 10:35:42 PM 900 Views
jeez Joel... - 07/06/2010 04:24:47 AM 895 Views
No, the Persians are not Arabs. - 07/06/2010 10:09:47 PM 1085 Views
I (coincidentally) stumbled across those infamous hadith passages about Jews the other day. - 07/06/2010 09:41:39 AM 991 Views
So? - 07/06/2010 10:50:49 PM 951 Views
So the relevance of apocalyptic passages is close to zero. - 07/06/2010 11:55:05 PM 889 Views
Not to mention - 08/06/2010 09:09:27 AM 793 Views
Then why are they canon? - 08/06/2010 06:25:09 PM 1092 Views
are you claiming that people would pull some things out of holy text and ignore the rest? - 08/06/2010 12:16:41 PM 944 Views
*NM* - 08/06/2010 01:16:13 PM 372 Views
well, for me this just proves why we are not supposed to live among non-Jews - 06/06/2010 11:39:45 PM 1060 Views
how so? - 06/06/2010 11:41:18 PM 816 Views
It reminds me of what I kept thinking as I read it. - 07/06/2010 12:51:36 AM 857 Views
couldn't get past the part where anyone who opposes Obama is a racist *NM* - 08/06/2010 01:40:07 AM 563 Views
You hallucinated? *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:39:37 AM 442 Views
No, that would've been one of the places where she should've shut up. *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:58:11 AM 380 Views
No - 08/06/2010 09:08:04 AM 830 Views
I think he's not talking about that bit, but about the very first paragraph. - 08/06/2010 09:30:21 AM 961 Views
If there was more I didn't get far enough to hear it - 08/06/2010 12:09:47 PM 820 Views
That's the problem with the speech - the large majority of what she had to say was worthwhile. - 08/06/2010 01:15:39 PM 877 Views
The problem is blatant bias - 08/06/2010 02:24:57 PM 879 Views

Reply to Message