he clearly wasn't just "making up an excuse" though.
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 21/06/2010 10:59:13 AM
Let's see YOU fake a unilateral face droop. Give it a shot.
And even if she wasn't clearly exhibiting a face droop, what's the safest bet for all? Let them in without hindrance, making the relatively small risk that they slip away unnoticed, OR refuse to let them into a hospital, making the large risk that the woman is really having a stroke and needs timely medical treatment and YOU denied it to her?
At least he DID let them in. Goodness knows what he would have done if she was having problems less obvious than a stroke.
And even if she wasn't clearly exhibiting a face droop, what's the safest bet for all? Let them in without hindrance, making the relatively small risk that they slip away unnoticed, OR refuse to let them into a hospital, making the large risk that the woman is really having a stroke and needs timely medical treatment and YOU denied it to her?
At least he DID let them in. Goodness knows what he would have done if she was having problems less obvious than a stroke.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Police Officer stops man from entering ER while wife is having stroke
- 20/06/2010 10:08:49 PM
1713 Views
So?
- 20/06/2010 11:53:33 PM
980 Views
Carrying a woman into the ER doesn't really scream "made up excuse"
- 21/06/2010 12:24:30 AM
1470 Views
*NM*
he clearly wasn't just "making up an excuse" though.
- 21/06/2010 10:59:13 AM
1210 Views
This story betrays a simple fact: police officers often abuse their "power".
- 21/06/2010 02:23:25 AM
1023 Views
Re: This story betrays a simple fact: police officers often abuse their "power".
- 21/06/2010 04:22:31 AM
1089 Views
unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly
- 21/06/2010 07:09:13 AM
998 Views
well this is,really, a drastically different situation
- 21/06/2010 08:11:39 AM
1051 Views
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law
- 21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM
914 Views
no. a officer is NOT only required to hold up the law.
- 22/06/2010 12:28:05 AM
924 Views
Re: unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly
- 21/06/2010 02:27:59 PM
890 Views
I am sorryt but your brother-in-law didn't have the right to endanger others
- 21/06/2010 07:20:20 PM
953 Views
nobody has that right but there should be some leeway considering the circumstances *NM*
- 22/06/2010 01:31:00 AM
494 Views
At the very least the officer should have let medical personnel take the woman in for treatment
- 21/06/2010 02:56:30 PM
960 Views
"The fact is that the man broke the law" is nonsense. That's what judgment is for.
- 21/06/2010 05:30:26 PM
1022 Views
But you can get pulled over for going 1 mile over.
- 21/06/2010 05:59:51 PM
1043 Views
Yes, you CAN, but any cop who did is a pathetic waste, who doesn't deserve the badge *NM*
- 22/06/2010 07:06:19 AM
450 Views
But then he's have to use a cell phone while driving! Another crime! *NM*
- 22/06/2010 02:41:51 AM
519 Views
*NM*
This is ridiculous
- 22/06/2010 03:18:03 AM
1087 Views
How exactly did I justify anything? Perhaps you missed the subject of my post.
- 22/06/2010 02:28:21 PM
1018 Views
I'm saying the fact that the law was broken is totally irrelevent,
- 23/06/2010 02:15:56 AM
1084 Views
It is sad when idiocy and a lack of judgment becomes codified into law backed with enforcement power
- 21/06/2010 09:56:32 PM
1556 Views
The cop should be fired and fined
- 23/06/2010 03:40:32 PM
954 Views