Active Users:790 Time:06/08/2025 12:21:40 AM
he clearly wasn't just "making up an excuse" though. LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 21/06/2010 10:59:13 AM
Let's see YOU fake a unilateral face droop. Give it a shot.

And even if she wasn't clearly exhibiting a face droop, what's the safest bet for all? Let them in without hindrance, making the relatively small risk that they slip away unnoticed, OR refuse to let them into a hospital, making the large risk that the woman is really having a stroke and needs timely medical treatment and YOU denied it to her?

At least he DID let them in. Goodness knows what he would have done if she was having problems less obvious than a stroke.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Police Officer stops man from entering ER while wife is having stroke - 20/06/2010 10:08:49 PM 1534 Views
So? - 20/06/2010 11:53:33 PM 868 Views
Seriously? - 21/06/2010 12:11:17 AM 941 Views
Carrying a woman into the ER doesn't really scream "made up excuse" - 21/06/2010 12:24:30 AM 1348 Views
Time and place. - 21/06/2010 02:25:27 AM 954 Views
Plus he was carrying a woman - 21/06/2010 11:40:18 AM 994 Views
Oh please. *NM* - 21/06/2010 03:34:16 AM 434 Views
i cant even take this seriously. - 21/06/2010 04:28:12 AM 1042 Views
he clearly wasn't just "making up an excuse" though. - 21/06/2010 10:59:13 AM 1083 Views
unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly - 21/06/2010 07:09:13 AM 881 Views
well this is,really, a drastically different situation - 21/06/2010 08:11:39 AM 931 Views
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law - 21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM 779 Views
no. a officer is NOT only required to hold up the law. - 22/06/2010 12:28:05 AM 800 Views
i'm not disagreeing with you - 22/06/2010 01:25:43 AM 906 Views
except in this case (you seem to be ignoring this) - 22/06/2010 01:35:21 AM 847 Views
At the very least the officer should have let medical personnel take the woman in for treatment - 21/06/2010 02:56:30 PM 842 Views
But... - 21/06/2010 04:58:06 PM 945 Views
"The fact is that the man broke the law" is nonsense. That's what judgment is for. - 21/06/2010 05:30:26 PM 909 Views
But you can get pulled over for going 1 mile over. - 21/06/2010 05:59:51 PM 913 Views
the thing is... - 22/06/2010 12:29:43 AM 791 Views
But then he's have to use a cell phone while driving! Another crime! *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:41:51 AM 460 Views
Not in TN *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:02:32 PM 397 Views
This is ridiculous - 22/06/2010 03:18:03 AM 939 Views
How exactly did I justify anything? Perhaps you missed the subject of my post. - 22/06/2010 02:28:21 PM 882 Views
I'm saying the fact that the law was broken is totally irrelevent, - 23/06/2010 02:15:56 AM 963 Views
How can it be even slightly irrelevant, let alone "totally" so? - 25/06/2010 03:24:19 PM 825 Views
It is sad when idiocy and a lack of judgment becomes codified into law backed with enforcement power - 21/06/2010 09:56:32 PM 1416 Views
i don't even know if I'd be happy with a lawsuit - 22/06/2010 12:31:18 AM 837 Views
The cop should be fired and fined - 23/06/2010 03:40:32 PM 824 Views
You are such a bleeding heart liberal.. - 25/06/2010 03:22:42 AM 823 Views
LOL - - 25/06/2010 03:11:47 PM 817 Views

Reply to Message