I'd say most urban areas have few roads with speed limits above 50 km/h (30mph)
Floffe Send a noteboard - 01/07/2010 10:35:20 AM
The point of my post was not that cyclists should get run over because they're annoying, only that they get run over because they put themselves in stupidly dangerous situations. You know how stupid it is to bike up a hill in a 45mph zone? Cars are driving by at at least 45mph and a bike is hobbling up at what? Maybe 15mph? Any decent human being will watch out for the cyclist going up a hill. They'll just be annoyed that they have to slow down, waste gas, and get to their destination a little later because Lance Wannabe can't take the bus or buy a treadmill. Now this source of annoyance isn't the source of the danger, it's only a SIGN that what Lance Wannabe is doing is DANGEROUS. Why is driver a annoyed? Because he has to put relatively considerable time and focus to looking out for Lance Wannabe (not that there's anything wrong with that, just stating the facts). The reason that he is annoyed is just why it's so dangerous. Because sooner or later, someone is going to make a mistake. Driver x will be talking on the phone, distracted by the kids in the back seat, driving drunk, fall asleep at the wheel, any number of things that can deprive them of the necessary focus to adapt to Lance Wannabe. In a perfect world, every driver could adapt and focus at all times. But humans are not perfect and neither is our world. Cyclists willfully put themselves in dangerous situations, then expect everyone else to adhere to a more perfect standard on their account. This is unfair, and plain stupid.
Get off your bike seat and wake up. You're endangering yourself by cycling in a busy, urban, roadway. That's a fact. Cars will do their best, but you don't own the road. Cars will make mistakes. They will kill you sometimes because either you or they inevitably makes a mistake. Getting mad at us drivers won't solve the problem. Getting on a stationary bike will.
Get off your bike seat and wake up. You're endangering yourself by cycling in a busy, urban, roadway. That's a fact. Cars will do their best, but you don't own the road. Cars will make mistakes. They will kill you sometimes because either you or they inevitably makes a mistake. Getting mad at us drivers won't solve the problem. Getting on a stationary bike will.
Also, a stationary bike will not fit the purpose of transportation.
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I got screamed at by a motorist while riding my bicycle today
- 28/06/2010 05:44:45 AM
1868 Views
Ummm
- 28/06/2010 06:01:19 AM
1497 Views
Let me guess. You live in an American suburb. *NM*
- 28/06/2010 06:12:24 AM
637 Views
Yeah, the "sport" part gives that away even more than everything else... *NM*
- 28/06/2010 08:06:03 AM
661 Views
seriously, you think people didn't use bikes as transportation anymore!! *NM*
- 28/06/2010 08:26:36 AM
744 Views
That was offensive to cyclists. People who think like you are why so many of us die. *NM*
- 28/06/2010 08:28:24 AM
727 Views
Now that I've calmed down a bit, I'm going to actually address your points.
- 28/06/2010 12:16:10 PM
1654 Views
hey now!
- 28/06/2010 01:18:16 PM
1165 Views
I understand that what he said offended you
- 28/06/2010 04:11:57 PM
1401 Views
You're right, I was stereotyping and getting a little ad hominem. I'm sorry. *NM*
- 29/06/2010 08:33:20 AM
692 Views
My social capital at this site is pretty low, so I don't mind admitting that I agree with MK.
- 28/06/2010 04:12:42 PM
1286 Views
- 28/06/2010 04:12:42 PM
1286 Views
Re: My social capital at this site is pretty low, so I don't mind admitting that I agree with MK.
- 28/06/2010 06:27:42 PM
1298 Views
- 28/06/2010 06:27:42 PM
1298 Views
This point:
- 28/06/2010 06:37:32 PM
1355 Views
Not in the United States.
- 28/06/2010 07:25:56 PM
1335 Views
Highways are, of course, a different matter.
- 28/06/2010 07:32:50 PM
1313 Views
I know
- 28/06/2010 07:34:04 PM
1407 Views
- 28/06/2010 07:34:04 PM
1407 Views
Re: I know
- 28/06/2010 08:27:04 PM
1292 Views
- 28/06/2010 08:27:04 PM
1292 Views
Re: I know
- 28/06/2010 08:38:14 PM
1398 Views
- 28/06/2010 08:38:14 PM
1398 Views
It is illegal to drive on the shoulder.
- 29/06/2010 09:43:40 AM
1406 Views
i'm pretty sure bicycles are banned from almost all highways, regardless of access
- 29/06/2010 02:34:00 PM
1180 Views
Maybe I should have said "modern roads."
- 28/06/2010 08:20:55 PM
1373 Views
Perhaps.
- 28/06/2010 08:36:15 PM
1430 Views
- 28/06/2010 08:36:15 PM
1430 Views
I think we just disagree on the necessity is all.
- 28/06/2010 09:00:44 PM
1195 Views
Yes, because that cyclist is SUCH a hazard to you in your car.
- 29/06/2010 01:03:05 AM
1340 Views
The central issue is people.
- 29/06/2010 09:52:22 AM
1311 Views
you keep talking about cyclists on highways as if it applied to all roads.
- 29/06/2010 02:37:31 PM
1415 Views
There are TWO equally important points there:
- 30/06/2010 01:15:17 AM
1384 Views
then why are you arguing with me? I said that the central issue is people being stupid. *NM*
- 01/07/2010 05:59:23 AM
662 Views
Two words: Public Transportation
- 30/06/2010 03:32:05 AM
1348 Views
...doesn't exist or is completely dysfunctional in a lot of places. *NM*
- 30/06/2010 03:57:26 AM
703 Views
Re: Two words: Public Transportation
- 30/06/2010 08:43:51 AM
1507 Views
Re: Two words: Public Transportation
- 01/07/2010 08:05:37 AM
1358 Views
You can't be serious. If you do think that's always (not just sometimes) a viable option, then...
- 30/06/2010 09:20:03 AM
1274 Views
My city doesn't have ANY. not even shuttle buses. *NM*
- 01/07/2010 06:00:22 AM
727 Views
Re: My city doesn't have ANY. not even shuttle buses.
- 01/07/2010 08:08:02 AM
1328 Views
Outside of a highly urbanized area, I surmise. The entirety of the US is not like the East Coast. *NM*
- 02/07/2010 02:11:01 AM
722 Views
Despite your subject line, I'm glad to see that we agree with each other more than MK and I do.
- 29/06/2010 10:13:29 AM
1429 Views
Get your head on straight, you silly cyclist
- 01/07/2010 08:02:58 AM
1211 Views
He never said there were no buses in our city. He said that, as a student, he can't afford them. *NM*
- 01/07/2010 08:42:47 AM
669 Views
I'd say most urban areas have few roads with speed limits above 50 km/h (30mph)
- 01/07/2010 10:35:20 AM
1245 Views
Now now, there's no need to be rude.
- 02/07/2010 12:04:16 AM
1418 Views
Re: Now now, there's no need to be rude.
- 04/07/2010 05:53:01 PM
1200 Views
That's always upsetting. You just have to remember that some people are simply arseholes, and...
- 28/06/2010 11:41:22 AM
1246 Views
Re: I got screamed at by a motorist while riding my bicycle today
- 28/06/2010 03:25:22 PM
1145 Views
Are they supposed to use sidewalks anywhere? *NM*
- 28/06/2010 04:58:50 PM
619 Views
In Sweden we often have combined bike and walking paths a few meters to the side of the road
- 28/06/2010 06:22:40 PM
1208 Views
Not sure, but
- 28/06/2010 06:53:14 PM
1205 Views
Thankfully I live in a very bike-friendly city, though this sort of thing has still happened to me. *NM*
- 28/06/2010 07:56:59 PM
701 Views
I'm so glad I actually READ what you said before responding.
- 29/06/2010 09:16:25 AM
1339 Views
- 29/06/2010 09:16:25 AM
1339 Views
?? I thought it was matter of COURSE that bikes weren't allowed on the highway
- 29/06/2010 09:27:06 AM
1290 Views
Should be, but it's not.
- 29/06/2010 09:59:35 AM
1276 Views
Question for you.
- 29/06/2010 10:22:13 AM
1130 Views
the law says they have to to ride in single file as close to curb as is practical
- 29/06/2010 03:31:55 PM
1214 Views

*NM*