Active Users:358 Time:03/07/2025 11:44:21 AM
He makes historical references as often as possible, or at least in pretty much everything I've seen snoopcester Send a noteboard - 20/08/2010 12:37:02 PM
Even if they're rather pointless or misleading he still makes them. It makes him sound like a deep thinker and like he is beating those arrogant liberal elites at their own game.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
An amusing column on the NYC mosque by Maureen Dowd.... - 20/08/2010 12:33:27 AM 1472 Views
wow, that was an interesting read - 20/08/2010 02:03:52 AM 837 Views
Gingrich thinks he is a deep thinker? - 20/08/2010 09:42:15 AM 688 Views
We've been through this, too, haven't we? - 20/08/2010 10:12:15 AM 980 Views
He makes historical references as often as possible, or at least in pretty much everything I've seen - 20/08/2010 12:37:02 PM 817 Views
As he was a history professor and writes histories and alternate histories, this is not surprising - 20/08/2010 05:33:48 PM 984 Views
I'm aware of that - 20/08/2010 11:47:32 PM 709 Views
Re: I'm aware of that - 21/08/2010 12:40:29 AM 996 Views
Re: I'm aware of that - 21/08/2010 01:19:37 AM 858 Views
Re: I'm aware of that - 21/08/2010 01:59:48 AM 740 Views
Conservatives love Rome. I don't know why. - 21/08/2010 01:20:27 AM 794 Views
Rome was more often than not governed by aristocrats and did, after all, invent the republic. - 21/08/2010 04:50:53 PM 1123 Views
"One man, one vote" always reminds me of Pratchett - 21/08/2010 05:03:35 PM 770 Views
Me too *NM* - 21/08/2010 06:53:22 PM 486 Views
Except there doesn't seem to be any conflict between either position. - 20/08/2010 10:06:20 AM 934 Views
When has logical consistency trumped politics? *NM* - 20/08/2010 01:50:55 PM 392 Views
True, but it does mean there's no "there" there. - 20/08/2010 02:41:49 PM 748 Views
He has to learn he needs to be crystal clear on sensitive issues - 20/08/2010 02:03:43 PM 993 Views
In Washington, one must always present the APPEARANCE of integrity... - 20/08/2010 02:40:24 PM 877 Views
Clinton lied about the BJ but what is your airtight proof that Bush lied? - 20/08/2010 07:44:53 PM 944 Views
Ask and ye shall receive: - 21/08/2010 06:42:50 PM 1118 Views
This is a bit along the lines of what I have been thinking. - 20/08/2010 07:49:15 PM 967 Views
that sort of illustrates the problem - 20/08/2010 08:56:42 PM 814 Views
It does - 22/08/2010 04:56:54 PM 723 Views
Can't find anything now on the context of the second statement. - 21/08/2010 05:05:51 PM 857 Views
I didn't see the problem either. He was simply stating the obvious. - 21/08/2010 01:39:44 AM 704 Views
maybe - 21/08/2010 02:49:40 AM 952 Views
Wow that is probably the best Dowd column I have ever read - 21/08/2010 01:35:36 AM 728 Views
Yes, his backtracking was quite pussy-ish. *NM* - 21/08/2010 04:00:31 AM 349 Views
How did he "backtrack" exactly? - 21/08/2010 04:35:33 PM 1009 Views
c'mon Joel. are you being intentionally thick? - 21/08/2010 05:02:27 PM 1027 Views
Having read those quotes I don't think he was backtracking on anything. (With link to speech) - 22/08/2010 06:27:06 AM 983 Views
*NM* - 22/08/2010 01:37:23 PM 389 Views
did you take into your consideration - 22/08/2010 03:50:59 PM 721 Views
I can't imagine why they would express concern over it. It wasn't controversial. That is on them - 22/08/2010 03:58:32 PM 921 Views
that would be - 22/08/2010 04:02:08 PM 1013 Views
But quote B just reiterated what he said the first time. - 22/08/2010 04:13:21 PM 843 Views
I agree he is not backtracking - 22/08/2010 06:49:36 PM 831 Views
I agree with you, Joel and Tash on this one. - 22/08/2010 07:52:34 PM 892 Views
While we're picking sides, I'm with Mook and Roland. - 22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM 758 Views
I never fail to be impressed with your intelligence - 22/08/2010 08:25:11 PM 909 Views
I like how he's got rhetorical talents when it works - 22/08/2010 08:32:15 PM 780 Views
nope just human *NM* - 22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM 418 Views
that's not what Paul just said. - 22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM 845 Views
He couldn't stay out, no. - 22/08/2010 08:56:47 PM 880 Views
I don't want to argue with you on a Sunday, my religion says I have to relax. - 22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM 899 Views
key word: seem - 22/08/2010 09:06:40 PM 817 Views
I was only using that term for you guys. I don't feel like beating you with a rolling pin until you - 22/08/2010 09:14:39 PM 717 Views
good thing - 22/08/2010 09:39:52 PM 1115 Views
he could have and should have stayed out - 22/08/2010 09:57:57 PM 853 Views
I think he's certainly got rhetoric talents... - 22/08/2010 08:54:11 PM 1280 Views
You don't really seem like you're taking a side to me. - 22/08/2010 09:14:02 PM 936 Views
I'm not even taking the time to comment on something so obvious as what he did. *NM* - 22/08/2010 02:53:10 AM 473 Views
Except, of course, that you just did. - 22/08/2010 12:30:00 PM 853 Views
Joel - 22/08/2010 05:37:45 AM 1033 Views
That last line was golden. *NM* - 22/08/2010 05:40:56 AM 442 Views
His phrasing in the first speech implied that it was a bad idea. But legally they have the right. - 22/08/2010 06:32:59 AM 950 Views
nonsense - 22/08/2010 03:39:30 PM 894 Views
I still don't see how it can be misinterpreted except by intent by the listener. - 22/08/2010 04:08:52 PM 871 Views
so we have reached the point of no return... - 22/08/2010 04:18:46 PM 879 Views
In your case it would have to be number 2. - 22/08/2010 07:38:20 PM 853 Views
ah, but I have no agenda here... - 22/08/2010 07:41:59 PM 685 Views
lol.<3 - 22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM 863 Views
that it is... - 22/08/2010 08:57:05 PM 833 Views
Tash you are very much a fair person in this world - 22/08/2010 08:34:38 PM 954 Views
Or there is another option: 3) He was using tact. - 22/08/2010 09:01:49 PM 859 Views
On the off chance that this: - 23/08/2010 12:38:48 AM 1051 Views
I do remember your reply... - 23/08/2010 02:57:29 AM 1278 Views
Lies, prevarication and deceit again, eh? - 22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM 1347 Views
that was a decent explanation.... - 22/08/2010 05:18:18 PM 797 Views
Thanks. - 22/08/2010 05:41:28 PM 859 Views
I do feel bad for them - 22/08/2010 08:40:36 PM 752 Views
Re: Joel - 22/08/2010 07:53:51 PM 895 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 22/08/2010 08:25:38 PM 543 Views

Reply to Message