They have the right but that doesn't make it a good idea.
How is that hard to understand?
How is that hard to understand?
if he said them both at the same time instead of talking about the right one night and the not a good idea the next day, it would have been a little clearer. As it is it was clearly political.
Mook
*MySmiley*
"Bustin' makes me feel good!"
Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
*MySmiley*
"Bustin' makes me feel good!"
Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
An amusing column on the NYC mosque by Maureen Dowd....
- 20/08/2010 12:33:27 AM
1603 Views
She has a point. Bush had the guts to weather the storm on DPW.
- 20/08/2010 12:42:21 AM
996 Views
DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
- 20/08/2010 12:50:14 AM
851 Views
Re: DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
- 20/08/2010 12:56:44 AM
1132 Views
Once again, listen to the Economist and don't use abbreviations that aren't obvious.
- 20/08/2010 06:38:08 PM
892 Views
That abbreviation was obvious and all over the place at the time the incident happened.
- 20/08/2010 07:59:08 PM
923 Views
I certainly don't remember seeing it anywhere. The abbreviation was unnecessary in any event.
- 20/08/2010 10:43:05 PM
843 Views
Sure, I could've done that, if I had realized it would puzzle people. I did not. *NM*
- 20/08/2010 10:59:42 PM
536 Views
well since Christie is actually a republican he makes a better example than Bloomberg
- 20/08/2010 01:53:44 PM
964 Views
Gingrich thinks he is a deep thinker?
- 20/08/2010 09:42:15 AM
805 Views
He makes historical references as often as possible, or at least in pretty much everything I've seen
- 20/08/2010 12:37:02 PM
958 Views
As he was a history professor and writes histories and alternate histories, this is not surprising
- 20/08/2010 05:33:48 PM
1105 Views
I'm aware of that
- 20/08/2010 11:47:32 PM
831 Views
Re: I'm aware of that
- 21/08/2010 12:40:29 AM
1109 Views
Conservatives love Rome. I don't know why.
- 21/08/2010 01:20:27 AM
907 Views
Rome was more often than not governed by aristocrats and did, after all, invent the republic.
- 21/08/2010 04:50:53 PM
1247 Views
Except there doesn't seem to be any conflict between either position.
- 20/08/2010 10:06:20 AM
1067 Views
He has to learn he needs to be crystal clear on sensitive issues
- 20/08/2010 02:03:43 PM
1103 Views
In Washington, one must always present the APPEARANCE of integrity...
- 20/08/2010 02:40:24 PM
1003 Views
Clinton lied about the BJ but what is your airtight proof that Bush lied?
- 20/08/2010 07:44:53 PM
1076 Views
This is a bit along the lines of what I have been thinking.
- 20/08/2010 07:49:15 PM
1094 Views
I didn't see the problem either. He was simply stating the obvious.
- 21/08/2010 01:39:44 AM
827 Views
maybe
- 21/08/2010 02:49:40 AM
1069 Views
Then restating it for those who refused to hear it, so that someone else could refuse to hear it.
- 21/08/2010 04:22:30 PM
1086 Views
Yes, his backtracking was quite pussy-ish. *NM*
- 21/08/2010 04:00:31 AM
412 Views
How did he "backtrack" exactly?
- 21/08/2010 04:35:33 PM
1154 Views
c'mon Joel. are you being intentionally thick?
- 21/08/2010 05:02:27 PM
1158 Views
Having read those quotes I don't think he was backtracking on anything. (With link to speech)
- 22/08/2010 06:27:06 AM
1108 Views
did you take into your consideration
- 22/08/2010 03:50:59 PM
845 Views
I can't imagine why they would express concern over it. It wasn't controversial. That is on them
- 22/08/2010 03:58:32 PM
1037 Views
I agree he is not backtracking
- 22/08/2010 06:49:36 PM
942 Views
While we're picking sides, I'm with Mook and Roland.
- 22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM
874 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM
874 Views
I like how he's got rhetorical talents when it works
- 22/08/2010 08:32:15 PM
894 Views
nope just human
*NM*
- 22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM
471 Views
*NM*
- 22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM
471 Views
that's not what Paul just said.
- 22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM
967 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM
967 Views
He couldn't stay out, no.
- 22/08/2010 08:56:47 PM
1032 Views
I don't want to argue with you on a Sunday, my religion says I have to relax.
- 22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM
1017 Views
- 22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM
1017 Views
key word: seem
- 22/08/2010 09:06:40 PM
946 Views
I was only using that term for you guys. I don't feel like beating you with a rolling pin until you
- 22/08/2010 09:14:39 PM
831 Views
Seems I interpret his speech on the iftar differently from you and Tash - see my reply to Tash. *NM*
- 22/08/2010 09:25:13 PM
548 Views
I'm not even taking the time to comment on something so obvious as what he did. *NM*
- 22/08/2010 02:53:10 AM
539 Views
Joel
- 22/08/2010 05:37:45 AM
1152 Views
His phrasing in the first speech implied that it was a bad idea. But legally they have the right.
- 22/08/2010 06:32:59 AM
1074 Views
nonsense
- 22/08/2010 03:39:30 PM
1016 Views
I still don't see how it can be misinterpreted except by intent by the listener.
- 22/08/2010 04:08:52 PM
983 Views
so we have reached the point of no return...
- 22/08/2010 04:18:46 PM
1000 Views
In your case it would have to be number 2.
- 22/08/2010 07:38:20 PM
977 Views
ah, but I have no agenda here...
- 22/08/2010 07:41:59 PM
807 Views
lol.<3
- 22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM
980 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM
980 Views
that it is...
- 22/08/2010 08:57:05 PM
992 Views
hee. Well, I still don't agree with you, but at least you're snuggly.^_^ *NM*
- 22/08/2010 09:09:22 PM
716 Views
Tash you are very much a fair person in this world
- 22/08/2010 08:34:38 PM
1071 Views
Or there is another option: 3) He was using tact.
- 22/08/2010 09:01:49 PM
1000 Views
I really have to disagree with your interpretation of that first speech.
- 22/08/2010 09:22:32 PM
1268 Views
Lies, prevarication and deceit again, eh?
- 22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM
1453 Views
- 22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM
1453 Views
that was a decent explanation....
- 22/08/2010 05:18:18 PM
912 Views
In the interests of fairness ( this does not support or detract from my position), here is the full
- 22/08/2010 09:22:50 PM
1222 Views
