Tash you are very much a fair person in this world
Roland00 Send a noteboard - 22/08/2010 08:34:38 PM
a very large number of people in this world are not fair minded and would give Obama the benefit of the doubt; either out of:
1) genuine different political opinions
2) genuine hatred
3) genuine misunderstanding of Obama in general
In that understanding it is very much up to Obama to couch his language on the lowest common denominator and make sure he is crystal clear.
So he wasn't crystal clear there are two possible explanations:
1) He messed up (this is possible but I find unlikely)
2) He was purposefully two faced (for political reasons which are now biting him in the ass for he messed up).
1) genuine different political opinions
2) genuine hatred
3) genuine misunderstanding of Obama in general
In that understanding it is very much up to Obama to couch his language on the lowest common denominator and make sure he is crystal clear.
So he wasn't crystal clear there are two possible explanations:
1) He messed up (this is possible but I find unlikely)
2) He was purposefully two faced (for political reasons which are now biting him in the ass for he messed up).
An amusing column on the NYC mosque by Maureen Dowd....
20/08/2010 12:33:27 AM
- 1485 Views
She has a point. Bush had the guts to weather the storm on DPW.
20/08/2010 12:42:21 AM
- 895 Views
DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
20/08/2010 12:50:14 AM
- 759 Views
Re: DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
20/08/2010 12:56:44 AM
- 1025 Views
Once again, listen to the Economist and don't use abbreviations that aren't obvious.
20/08/2010 06:38:08 PM
- 777 Views
That abbreviation was obvious and all over the place at the time the incident happened.
20/08/2010 07:59:08 PM
- 813 Views
I certainly don't remember seeing it anywhere. The abbreviation was unnecessary in any event.
20/08/2010 10:43:05 PM
- 739 Views
Sure, I could've done that, if I had realized it would puzzle people. I did not. *NM*
20/08/2010 10:59:42 PM
- 485 Views
well since Christie is actually a republican he makes a better example than Bloomberg
20/08/2010 01:53:44 PM
- 836 Views
Gingrich thinks he is a deep thinker?
20/08/2010 09:42:15 AM
- 699 Views
He makes historical references as often as possible, or at least in pretty much everything I've seen
20/08/2010 12:37:02 PM
- 829 Views
As he was a history professor and writes histories and alternate histories, this is not surprising
20/08/2010 05:33:48 PM
- 1001 Views
I'm aware of that
20/08/2010 11:47:32 PM
- 726 Views
Re: I'm aware of that
21/08/2010 12:40:29 AM
- 1010 Views
Conservatives love Rome. I don't know why.
21/08/2010 01:20:27 AM
- 808 Views
Rome was more often than not governed by aristocrats and did, after all, invent the republic.
21/08/2010 04:50:53 PM
- 1136 Views
Except there doesn't seem to be any conflict between either position.
20/08/2010 10:06:20 AM
- 948 Views
He has to learn he needs to be crystal clear on sensitive issues
20/08/2010 02:03:43 PM
- 1005 Views
In Washington, one must always present the APPEARANCE of integrity...
20/08/2010 02:40:24 PM
- 893 Views
Clinton lied about the BJ but what is your airtight proof that Bush lied?
20/08/2010 07:44:53 PM
- 962 Views
This is a bit along the lines of what I have been thinking.
20/08/2010 07:49:15 PM
- 982 Views
I didn't see the problem either. He was simply stating the obvious.
21/08/2010 01:39:44 AM
- 717 Views
Then restating it for those who refused to hear it, so that someone else could refuse to hear it.
21/08/2010 04:22:30 PM
- 987 Views
Yes, his backtracking was quite pussy-ish. *NM*
21/08/2010 04:00:31 AM
- 355 Views
How did he "backtrack" exactly?
21/08/2010 04:35:33 PM
- 1026 Views
c'mon Joel. are you being intentionally thick?
21/08/2010 05:02:27 PM
- 1046 Views
Having read those quotes I don't think he was backtracking on anything. (With link to speech)
22/08/2010 06:27:06 AM
- 999 Views
did you take into your consideration
22/08/2010 03:50:59 PM
- 741 Views
I can't imagine why they would express concern over it. It wasn't controversial. That is on them
22/08/2010 03:58:32 PM
- 936 Views
I agree he is not backtracking
22/08/2010 06:49:36 PM
- 844 Views
While we're picking sides, I'm with Mook and Roland.
22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM
- 772 Views

I like how he's got rhetorical talents when it works
22/08/2010 08:32:15 PM
- 794 Views
nope just human
*NM*
22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM
- 422 Views

that's not what Paul just said.
22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM
- 858 Views

He couldn't stay out, no.
22/08/2010 08:56:47 PM
- 895 Views
I don't want to argue with you on a Sunday, my religion says I have to relax.
22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM
- 912 Views

key word: seem
22/08/2010 09:06:40 PM
- 835 Views
I was only using that term for you guys. I don't feel like beating you with a rolling pin until you
22/08/2010 09:14:39 PM
- 732 Views
Seems I interpret his speech on the iftar differently from you and Tash - see my reply to Tash. *NM*
22/08/2010 09:25:13 PM
- 498 Views
I'm not even taking the time to comment on something so obvious as what he did. *NM*
22/08/2010 02:53:10 AM
- 478 Views
Joel
22/08/2010 05:37:45 AM
- 1047 Views
His phrasing in the first speech implied that it was a bad idea. But legally they have the right.
22/08/2010 06:32:59 AM
- 965 Views
nonsense
22/08/2010 03:39:30 PM
- 909 Views
I still don't see how it can be misinterpreted except by intent by the listener.
22/08/2010 04:08:52 PM
- 884 Views
so we have reached the point of no return...
22/08/2010 04:18:46 PM
- 894 Views
In your case it would have to be number 2.
22/08/2010 07:38:20 PM
- 867 Views
ah, but I have no agenda here...
22/08/2010 07:41:59 PM
- 699 Views
lol.<3
22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM
- 876 Views

that it is...
22/08/2010 08:57:05 PM
- 873 Views
hee. Well, I still don't agree with you, but at least you're snuggly.^_^ *NM*
22/08/2010 09:09:22 PM
- 662 Views
Tash you are very much a fair person in this world
22/08/2010 08:34:38 PM
- 973 Views
Or there is another option: 3) He was using tact.
22/08/2010 09:01:49 PM
- 904 Views
I really have to disagree with your interpretation of that first speech.
22/08/2010 09:22:32 PM
- 1168 Views
Lies, prevarication and deceit again, eh?
22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM
- 1359 Views

that was a decent explanation....
22/08/2010 05:18:18 PM
- 812 Views
In the interests of fairness ( this does not support or detract from my position), here is the full
22/08/2010 09:22:50 PM
- 1089 Views