Active Users:610 Time:06/08/2025 01:28:36 PM
Re: what a stupid decision... Ryan Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM
to say that your driveway isn't considered "private". yes, anyone can just walk onto my driveway...that doesn't mean anyone is actually ALLOWED to. deliverymen, guests, etc... it is perfectly legal to keep any of these people from entering your driveway/lawn. Strangers just wandering across the lawn is TRESPASSING, even if it happens regularly. Just because a fence is not built on the property line doesn't mean it does not exist.


Precisely, and it is part of a growing class distinction.
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1588 Views
what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 916 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1143 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 957 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 905 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 952 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 920 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 1000 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 883 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 1023 Views
It does seem wrong - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 946 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1099 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 977 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 881 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 976 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 1001 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 435 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 440 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 932 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 989 Views
but effective - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 850 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 990 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 841 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 979 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 981 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 898 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1200 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 464 Views
It was Franklin. - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 997 Views
i do love that quote - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 886 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 828 Views
it's a lovely musical - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 812 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 889 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 1091 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1039 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 977 Views
I don't think that's true. - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 903 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 967 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 1008 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1114 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1091 Views
I think... - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 952 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 437 Views
ummmm.... - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 931 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 369 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 862 Views
I have 3 words for you... - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1145 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 423 Views
right - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 965 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 928 Views

Reply to Message