Active Users:633 Time:18/03/2026 11:58:56 PM
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM
and more that people should expect privacy despite the lack of fence. If you make the distinction that someone with a fence can't have their home invaded by the police, but if they magically didn't have a fence it would be okay, how is that right? A driveway is RIGHT BY a person's home and sleeping quarters. Would the courts also rule against someone who thought someone was trying to rob the and assaulted the individual...only to find out it was an officer?

A driveway is private or it is not. Even if you have to cross a fence to get TO the driveway, there is not typically a fence between the house and the drive. Once you're to the drive, the "privacy" is typically the same.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1720 Views
what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 1064 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1271 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 1085 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 1020 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 1106 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 1088 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 1112 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 1010 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 1143 Views
It does seem wrong - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 1075 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1222 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 1114 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 988 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 1102 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 1138 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 497 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 551 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 1077 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 1111 Views
but effective - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 977 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 1124 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 964 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 1128 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 1105 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 1031 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1346 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 555 Views
It was Franklin. - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 1144 Views
i do love that quote - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 1023 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 965 Views
it's a lovely musical - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 956 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 1005 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 1249 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1162 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 1117 Views
I don't think that's true. - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 1039 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 1126 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 1166 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1248 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1228 Views
I think... - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 1082 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 961 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 1028 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 511 Views
ummmm.... - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 1049 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 429 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 984 Views
I have 3 words for you... - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1297 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 498 Views
right - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 1098 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 1054 Views

Reply to Message