Yes, I expect that people can snap pictures of me.
I don't expect to have people legally tampering with my vehicles. in my driveway, or with anything else in my front yard.
My neighbors aren't entering my property when they're ogling...but the police are entering my property. I have an expectation of people to not invade my property without invitation. I'd say that deliverymen have an implicit invitation and solicitors should fuck off.
To further clarify (I'm not very good at being clear), I'm basically trying to differentiate between VISUAL privacy and PHYSICAL privacy. I wouldn't expect to have visual privacy dancing naked in front of a large window in my front view...but I would expect not to find my neighbors standing against my window with their faces pressed to the glass.
I don't expect to have people legally tampering with my vehicles. in my driveway, or with anything else in my front yard.
My neighbors aren't entering my property when they're ogling...but the police are entering my property. I have an expectation of people to not invade my property without invitation. I'd say that deliverymen have an implicit invitation and solicitors should fuck off.
To further clarify (I'm not very good at being clear), I'm basically trying to differentiate between VISUAL privacy and PHYSICAL privacy. I wouldn't expect to have visual privacy dancing naked in front of a large window in my front view...but I would expect not to find my neighbors standing against my window with their faces pressed to the glass.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 25/08/2010 at 04:41:06 PM
1984 at last...Very Disturbing
25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM
- 1622 Views
what a stupid decision...
25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM
- 951 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway
25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM
- 1000 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures.
25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM
- 936 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter?
25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM
- 1035 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho
26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM
- 1054 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM*
26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM
- 463 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing
25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM
- 1008 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law?
25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM
- 909 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer
25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM
- 1004 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent?
25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM
- 1037 Views

most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM*
25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM
- 455 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM*
25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM
- 489 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting
25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM
- 960 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean.
25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM
- 1032 Views
but effective
25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM
- 881 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE
25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM
- 1023 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer
25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM
- 871 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though.
25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM
- 1029 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered
26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM
- 1009 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon..
26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM
- 928 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted?
26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM
- 1241 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM*
26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM
- 437 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM*
25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM
- 499 Views
It was Franklin.
25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM
- 1029 Views

i do love that quote
25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM
- 928 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed.
25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM
- 857 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM*
25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM
- 441 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me.
25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM
- 1069 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property
25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM
- 1006 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign
25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM
- 1013 Views
I think...
25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM
- 989 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house.
25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM
- 869 Views