Active Users:630 Time:18/03/2026 09:50:28 PM
It does seem wrong snoopcester Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM
I would think there should be a difference between, for want of a better way of putting it, visual privacy (they can see what is on your drive from accross the road) and physical privacy (doesn't mean they should be allowed to come over onto your property and mess with what they can see)
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1717 Views
what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 1060 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1269 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 1084 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 1019 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 1104 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 1087 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 1110 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 1009 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 1142 Views
It does seem wrong - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 1075 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1221 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 1111 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 986 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 1099 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 1136 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 496 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 549 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 1073 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 1107 Views
but effective - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 976 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 1122 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 963 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 1124 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 1102 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 1030 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1344 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 554 Views
It was Franklin. - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 1141 Views
i do love that quote - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 1020 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 964 Views
it's a lovely musical - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 953 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 1004 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 1248 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1161 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 1116 Views
I don't think that's true. - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 1038 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 1124 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 1165 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1244 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1224 Views
I think... - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 1082 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 961 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 1027 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 510 Views
ummmm.... - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 1047 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 428 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 980 Views
I have 3 words for you... - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1293 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 496 Views
right - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 1098 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 1052 Views

Reply to Message