Active Users:1095 Time:03/05/2026 03:03:32 PM
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem. Joel Send a noteboard - 12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM
The issue is it would take about five or six respected, well-liked and entertaining rafonauts, with enough motivation to initiate the communication method and then appeal to their cohorts to join in. And do it regularly enough that it isn't a one-time event.

There have been spates of Skype activity periodically since wotmania went down and took it Chat with it, but it's like pulling teeth to get more than two or three people to try it at the same TIME. A few people come in for a couple days, see it's not this sprawling free for all with dozens of people, get bored and move on; a few weeks later a couple other people come in and do the same thing. It's like NASA sent out SETI probes, got bored when they didn't hear anything after a week, and everyone was off playing video games by the time ET phoned home.

Which is how I came to settle into just hanging out with the people who do visit regularly, or at least semi-regularly. It was never my goal to create a substitute for wotmania Chat, though Skype chats and conference calls generally my desire for that. In terms of architecture, I think it could fill that void for most people, but this conceit that there's some vast legion of unserviced chatters doesn't square with my observations, however limited my perspective. There are a couple dozen people who like some chat sometimes, depending on who's in there. That doesn't seem to really justify creating an entire new section of the site, when something's already filling that need without giving Ben any more to do (unless you count removing himself from a Skype convo when I create a new one and pull in every wotmaniac on my contact list. :P)

Just providing a place to have a Chat isn't going to bring back all the old wotmania Chat regulars though. If that's the problem, I suggest someone start sending emails, 'cos it ain't as easy as "if you build it he will come. " Trust me. Skype provides every electronic requirement. In fact, it has several things Chat lacked; boots stick and anyone who doesn't like it can just try and start another call/chat (of course, as was learned early on, that doesn't mean anyone will answer. ;)) People depend on who shows up at any given time, which is why I try to encourage as many people as possible to do so as often as possible. If all the things that made Chat desirable are absent though, giving them one more venue in which to be absent isn't going to make anything better, and doing it on RAFO WOULD make a lot more work for Ben.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Chat - 10/10/2010 07:34:44 AM 1176 Views
Yes - 10/10/2010 11:10:18 AM 708 Views
Hey you - 10/10/2010 04:14:47 PM 790 Views
Hey Missa - 13/10/2010 04:35:46 AM 668 Views
I've already had several days like that. Yet people keep insisting RAFO is better without chat. *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:29:46 PM 419 Views
it depends which chat we get. - 10/10/2010 05:44:58 PM 764 Views
You're in the Skype Chat now, btw. - 10/10/2010 10:59:24 PM 681 Views
When chat used to be down for long stretches, everyone would just pile into AIM chat. - 10/10/2010 06:54:33 PM 823 Views
Which they could easily do with Skype and get voice, yet no one does. - 10/10/2010 10:56:55 PM 861 Views
The idea of voice chat creeps me out on so many levels *NM* - 11/10/2010 12:34:22 AM 796 Views
So don't do voice; we rarely do. - 11/10/2010 07:35:33 AM 790 Views
Same *NM* - 11/10/2010 09:40:29 AM 330 Views
Is that why the Edinburgh gathering pics are always nothing but sign language and dirty gestures? *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:36:00 PM 414 Views
Come and find out *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:48:56 PM 304 Views
The group that is popularized as being a part of that is not enticing to long standing wotmaniacs. *NM* - 11/10/2010 03:29:57 AM 453 Views
This. *NM* - 11/10/2010 04:43:52 AM 290 Views
Then that, again, seems a problem that coding can't solve. - 11/10/2010 07:33:32 AM 830 Views
I don't think most want to download another program when they had it so easy before. - 11/10/2010 10:39:55 PM 855 Views
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem. - 12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM 862 Views
I disagree. I don't think enough people think it worth the effort to deal with Skype. - 12/10/2010 04:28:21 AM 754 Views
What effort? - 12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM 740 Views
The effort beyond clicking two buttons. - 13/10/2010 04:25:57 AM 615 Views
Install, make a SN and search for people you email. - 13/10/2010 04:43:09 AM 792 Views
Re: - 12/10/2010 11:00:56 PM 619 Views
Then where are they? - 13/10/2010 04:00:46 AM 685 Views
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007. - 13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM 760 Views
Again, that's people, and not/having Chat won't change that. - 13/10/2010 04:45:40 AM 769 Views
Incorrect - 13/10/2010 04:58:30 AM 792 Views
Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 05:12:27 AM 847 Views
Re: Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 02:45:50 PM 711 Views
And me! - 13/10/2010 03:27:15 PM 712 Views
oops, sorry about that. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:42:33 PM 665 Views
What do you mean where are they? There isn't a chat linked to the site. - 13/10/2010 10:44:10 PM 818 Views
So? - 14/10/2010 04:52:37 AM 800 Views
Are you deliberately trying to not understand? - 14/10/2010 05:54:16 AM 918 Views
Not deliberately. - 14/10/2010 06:21:09 AM 803 Views
I doubt that as well, frankly. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:32:33 PM 338 Views
Things aren't what they used to be... - 13/10/2010 10:46:04 PM 734 Views
No - 13/10/2010 04:45:29 AM 700 Views
"Unmoderated" would be going too far. - 13/10/2010 04:53:19 AM 836 Views
Most of the group consists of long-standing Wotmaniacs, so. *NM* - 12/10/2010 05:25:39 AM 409 Views
I probably didn't phrase that right. Maybe an -er after long and an "in good" before standing. - 12/10/2010 11:02:30 PM 804 Views
Also, what qualifies as "good standing"? Who's the judge? *NM* - 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM 440 Views
The one who wants to chat, of course? *NM* - 13/10/2010 07:23:15 AM 400 Views
Jonte is right. The judges are numerous. Each with their own motivations and interests. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:10:04 PM 378 Views
I'd fuck myself to death with a spike of frozen cat piss before I'd chat with that skype crowd. - 13/10/2010 11:42:16 PM 816 Views
Colorful. You big, gay elitist. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:06:14 AM 410 Views
See - 14/10/2010 05:42:21 AM 704 Views
we are Rafonauts now. - 13/10/2010 03:16:32 PM 663 Views
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though. - 13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM 838 Views
I sure hope you're right. - 14/10/2010 05:04:26 AM 884 Views
I am RAFOlk. - 14/10/2010 06:22:25 AM 690 Views
When I got facebook I stopped logging in to aim. - 11/10/2010 01:24:26 AM 715 Views
There's a Chat if you want one. - 10/10/2010 11:01:57 PM 822 Views
i wouldn't say mutely - 10/10/2010 11:40:13 PM 795 Views
Ditto. - 10/10/2010 11:53:32 PM 728 Views
Well, like I said, talk about something else. - 11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM 752 Views
do you know how hard it is stopping sports fanatics talking about sports? - 11/10/2010 09:59:56 AM 835 Views
I'll usually shut up if someone carries another topic. - 12/10/2010 04:25:19 AM 767 Views
I'd deign to chat with you, m'friend. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:43:13 PM 363 Views
- 14/10/2010 05:45:26 AM 733 Views
Re: - 14/10/2010 05:47:07 AM 755 Views
While I'm passing through, "Hi wooly and Kit. Long time." *NM* - 14/10/2010 10:14:49 PM 408 Views

Reply to Message