Active Users:489 Time:18/09/2025 01:03:11 PM
I'll usually shut up if someone carries another topic. Joel Send a noteboard - 12/10/2010 04:25:19 AM
Would have totally gone there tonight if it existed. Oh well.

Several, in fact. With optional voice. I could have someone to argue with when I say, "Heh, Chefs suck" instead of Lucy and Stephen just staring at me mutely wondering what's up with the Yank.

i'm being vocally bored.

Not like I'm running both keyboards. ;)


just last week my family was talking in golf and it was a bugger getting them away from the telly and talking about other things.

I do get into it, but I also have a habit of fill silences. :<img class=' />
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Chat - 10/10/2010 07:34:44 AM 1102 Views
Yes - 10/10/2010 11:10:18 AM 627 Views
Hey you - 10/10/2010 04:14:47 PM 704 Views
Hey Missa - 13/10/2010 04:35:46 AM 589 Views
I've already had several days like that. Yet people keep insisting RAFO is better without chat. *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:29:46 PM 385 Views
it depends which chat we get. - 10/10/2010 05:44:58 PM 667 Views
You're in the Skype Chat now, btw. - 10/10/2010 10:59:24 PM 607 Views
When chat used to be down for long stretches, everyone would just pile into AIM chat. - 10/10/2010 06:54:33 PM 744 Views
Which they could easily do with Skype and get voice, yet no one does. - 10/10/2010 10:56:55 PM 762 Views
The idea of voice chat creeps me out on so many levels *NM* - 11/10/2010 12:34:22 AM 714 Views
So don't do voice; we rarely do. - 11/10/2010 07:35:33 AM 713 Views
Same *NM* - 11/10/2010 09:40:29 AM 294 Views
Is that why the Edinburgh gathering pics are always nothing but sign language and dirty gestures? *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:36:00 PM 383 Views
Come and find out *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:48:56 PM 276 Views
The group that is popularized as being a part of that is not enticing to long standing wotmaniacs. *NM* - 11/10/2010 03:29:57 AM 398 Views
This. *NM* - 11/10/2010 04:43:52 AM 253 Views
Then that, again, seems a problem that coding can't solve. - 11/10/2010 07:33:32 AM 744 Views
I don't think most want to download another program when they had it so easy before. - 11/10/2010 10:39:55 PM 764 Views
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem. - 12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM 765 Views
I disagree. I don't think enough people think it worth the effort to deal with Skype. - 12/10/2010 04:28:21 AM 674 Views
What effort? - 12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM 664 Views
The effort beyond clicking two buttons. - 13/10/2010 04:25:57 AM 540 Views
Install, make a SN and search for people you email. - 13/10/2010 04:43:09 AM 711 Views
Re: - 12/10/2010 11:00:56 PM 549 Views
Then where are they? - 13/10/2010 04:00:46 AM 615 Views
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007. - 13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM 693 Views
Again, that's people, and not/having Chat won't change that. - 13/10/2010 04:45:40 AM 686 Views
Incorrect - 13/10/2010 04:58:30 AM 708 Views
Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 05:12:27 AM 772 Views
Re: Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 02:45:50 PM 635 Views
And me! - 13/10/2010 03:27:15 PM 635 Views
oops, sorry about that. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:42:33 PM 589 Views
What do you mean where are they? There isn't a chat linked to the site. - 13/10/2010 10:44:10 PM 733 Views
So? - 14/10/2010 04:52:37 AM 692 Views
Are you deliberately trying to not understand? - 14/10/2010 05:54:16 AM 827 Views
Not deliberately. - 14/10/2010 06:21:09 AM 705 Views
I doubt that as well, frankly. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:32:33 PM 305 Views
Things aren't what they used to be... - 13/10/2010 10:46:04 PM 635 Views
No - 13/10/2010 04:45:29 AM 614 Views
"Unmoderated" would be going too far. - 13/10/2010 04:53:19 AM 758 Views
Most of the group consists of long-standing Wotmaniacs, so. *NM* - 12/10/2010 05:25:39 AM 372 Views
I probably didn't phrase that right. Maybe an -er after long and an "in good" before standing. - 12/10/2010 11:02:30 PM 724 Views
Also, what qualifies as "good standing"? Who's the judge? *NM* - 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM 412 Views
The one who wants to chat, of course? *NM* - 13/10/2010 07:23:15 AM 371 Views
Jonte is right. The judges are numerous. Each with their own motivations and interests. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:10:04 PM 344 Views
I'd fuck myself to death with a spike of frozen cat piss before I'd chat with that skype crowd. - 13/10/2010 11:42:16 PM 734 Views
Colorful. You big, gay elitist. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:06:14 AM 376 Views
See - 14/10/2010 05:42:21 AM 620 Views
we are Rafonauts now. - 13/10/2010 03:16:32 PM 580 Views
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though. - 13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM 759 Views
I sure hope you're right. - 14/10/2010 05:04:26 AM 800 Views
I am RAFOlk. - 14/10/2010 06:22:25 AM 603 Views
When I got facebook I stopped logging in to aim. - 11/10/2010 01:24:26 AM 626 Views
There's a Chat if you want one. - 10/10/2010 11:01:57 PM 738 Views
i wouldn't say mutely - 10/10/2010 11:40:13 PM 705 Views
Ditto. - 10/10/2010 11:53:32 PM 644 Views
Well, like I said, talk about something else. - 11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM 653 Views
do you know how hard it is stopping sports fanatics talking about sports? - 11/10/2010 09:59:56 AM 745 Views
I'll usually shut up if someone carries another topic. - 12/10/2010 04:25:19 AM 686 Views
I'd deign to chat with you, m'friend. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:43:13 PM 333 Views
- 14/10/2010 05:45:26 AM 634 Views
Re: - 14/10/2010 05:47:07 AM 679 Views
While I'm passing through, "Hi wooly and Kit. Long time." *NM* - 14/10/2010 10:14:49 PM 379 Views

Reply to Message