Active Users:684 Time:18/03/2026 06:47:27 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though. TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM
Or something.


what your standing was on wotmania doesn't matter any more.


I disagree. I consider each person's perception as a RAFOnaut to be a continuation of their wotmania history. If you spent 8 to 10 years at wotmania and you've now been visiting RAFO for over a year, people will judge you for the 9 to 11 years of content you've contributed and relationships you've been a part of. Not just the previous one year. You can add onto your history from the previous site, but not erase it. RAFO didn't give everyone a fresh slate in which all preconceived notions about them were abandoned. Not to say people can't be forgiven for who they were, have their levels or respect rise or fall, but that could be true of a person's 8th year at wotmania compared to their 5th as much as it would their first year at RAFO compared to their last at wotmania.

So to say that who you were at wotmania doesn't matter or is invalidated by RAFO's existence is false. If someone who was a recognized veteran of wotmania were to post on RAFO for the first time tomorrow, we would all embrace them as who we knew them to be.
Reply to message
Chat John - 10/10/2010 07:34:44 AM 1159 Views
Yes Camilla - 10/10/2010 11:10:18 AM 691 Views
Hey you Missa Sedai - 10/10/2010 04:14:47 PM 770 Views
Hey Missa John - 13/10/2010 04:35:46 AM 651 Views
I've already had several days like that. Yet people keep insisting RAFO is better without chat. *NM* Aeryn - 10/10/2010 05:29:46 PM 409 Views
it depends which chat we get. LadyLorraine - 10/10/2010 05:44:58 PM 729 Views
You're in the Skype Chat now, btw. Joel - 10/10/2010 10:59:24 PM 657 Views
When chat used to be down for long stretches, everyone would just pile into AIM chat. TaskmasterJack - 10/10/2010 06:54:33 PM 804 Views
Which they could easily do with Skype and get voice, yet no one does. Joel - 10/10/2010 10:56:55 PM 827 Views
The idea of voice chat creeps me out on so many levels *NM* Camilla - 11/10/2010 12:34:22 AM 775 Views
So don't do voice; we rarely do. Joel - 11/10/2010 07:35:33 AM 772 Views
Same *NM* ironclad - 11/10/2010 09:40:29 AM 321 Views
Is that why the Edinburgh gathering pics are always nothing but sign language and dirty gestures? *NM* TaskmasterJack - 11/10/2010 10:36:00 PM 406 Views
Come and find out *NM* Camilla - 11/10/2010 10:48:56 PM 298 Views
The group that is popularized as being a part of that is not enticing to long standing wotmaniacs. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 11/10/2010 03:29:57 AM 432 Views
This. *NM* Ghavrel - 11/10/2010 04:43:52 AM 278 Views
Then that, again, seems a problem that coding can't solve. Joel - 11/10/2010 07:33:32 AM 807 Views
I don't think most want to download another program when they had it so easy before. TaskmasterJack - 11/10/2010 10:39:55 PM 833 Views
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem. Joel - 12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM 845 Views
I disagree. I don't think enough people think it worth the effort to deal with Skype. Ghavrel - 12/10/2010 04:28:21 AM 730 Views
What effort? Joel - 12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM 721 Views
The effort beyond clicking two buttons. Ghavrel - 13/10/2010 04:25:57 AM 599 Views
Install, make a SN and search for people you email. Joel - 13/10/2010 04:43:09 AM 770 Views
Re: TaskmasterJack - 12/10/2010 11:00:56 PM 601 Views
Then where are they? Joel - 13/10/2010 04:00:46 AM 666 Views
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007. Ghavrel - 13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM 743 Views
Again, that's people, and not/having Chat won't change that. Joel - 13/10/2010 04:45:40 AM 745 Views
Incorrect John - 13/10/2010 04:58:30 AM 771 Views
Initially only the person who started it can boot. Joel - 13/10/2010 05:12:27 AM 825 Views
Re: Initially only the person who started it can boot. BlackAdder - 13/10/2010 02:45:50 PM 694 Views
And me! Kronin al'Sulc - 13/10/2010 03:27:15 PM 691 Views
oops, sorry about that. *NM* BlackAdder - 13/10/2010 03:42:33 PM 649 Views
Sounds right; don't really know much about The Tavern except that's all in character. Joel - 14/10/2010 04:54:06 AM 754 Views
What do you mean where are they? There isn't a chat linked to the site. TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 10:44:10 PM 796 Views
So? Joel - 14/10/2010 04:52:37 AM 781 Views
Are you deliberately trying to not understand? John - 14/10/2010 05:54:16 AM 897 Views
Not deliberately. Joel - 14/10/2010 06:21:09 AM 781 Views
I have to admit that I highly doubt I would ever participate if a revived chat were installed Larry - 13/10/2010 05:08:38 AM 747 Views
I doubt that as well, frankly. *NM* Legolas - 13/10/2010 03:32:33 PM 329 Views
Things aren't what they used to be... TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 10:46:04 PM 711 Views
No John - 13/10/2010 04:45:29 AM 677 Views
"Unmoderated" would be going too far. Joel - 13/10/2010 04:53:19 AM 818 Views
Most of the group consists of long-standing Wotmaniacs, so. *NM* Dan - 12/10/2010 05:25:39 AM 399 Views
I probably didn't phrase that right. Maybe an -er after long and an "in good" before standing. TaskmasterJack - 12/10/2010 11:02:30 PM 780 Views
Plenty of people who've been around as long as you, and plenty in good standing. *NM* Dan - 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM 396 Views
I see that my comments are being interpeted as a blanket insult to all parties involved... TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 11:09:09 PM 767 Views
Also "as long as me" doesn't really factor, because I wasn't using myself to set the bar. TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 11:26:29 PM 832 Views
Also, what qualifies as "good standing"? Who's the judge? *NM* Dan - 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM 432 Views
The one who wants to chat, of course? *NM* jh - 13/10/2010 07:23:15 AM 392 Views
Jonte is right. The judges are numerous. Each with their own motivations and interests. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 11:10:04 PM 370 Views
I'd fuck myself to death with a spike of frozen cat piss before I'd chat with that skype crowd. LiterateDog - 13/10/2010 11:42:16 PM 787 Views
Colorful. You big, gay elitist. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 14/10/2010 12:06:14 AM 401 Views
See Kit - 14/10/2010 05:42:21 AM 684 Views
we are Rafonauts now. Yunalesca - 13/10/2010 03:16:32 PM 637 Views
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though. TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM 819 Views
I sure hope you're right. Joel - 14/10/2010 05:04:26 AM 863 Views
I am RAFOlk. Joel - 14/10/2010 06:22:25 AM 668 Views
When I got facebook I stopped logging in to aim. Avendesora - 11/10/2010 01:24:26 AM 682 Views
There's a Chat if you want one. Joel - 10/10/2010 11:01:57 PM 801 Views
i wouldn't say mutely Yunalesca - 10/10/2010 11:40:13 PM 771 Views
Ditto. Stephen - 10/10/2010 11:53:32 PM 710 Views
Well, like I said, talk about something else. Joel - 11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM 727 Views
do you know how hard it is stopping sports fanatics talking about sports? Yunalesca - 11/10/2010 09:59:56 AM 806 Views
I'll usually shut up if someone carries another topic. Joel - 12/10/2010 04:25:19 AM 739 Views
I'd deign to chat with you, m'friend. *NM* LiterateDog - 13/10/2010 11:43:13 PM 356 Views
John - 14/10/2010 05:45:26 AM 712 Views
Re: Kit - 14/10/2010 05:47:07 AM 738 Views
While I'm passing through, "Hi wooly and Kit. Long time." *NM* TaskmasterJack - 14/10/2010 10:14:49 PM 399 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes