Format advantages or not, people still have to make an effort to find your chat room. With a site hosted chat all they need to do is make one click to check who's in and make a decision whether to enter or not.
Chat
- 10/10/2010 07:34:44 AM
941 Views
I've already had several days like that. Yet people keep insisting RAFO is better without chat. *NM*
- 10/10/2010 05:29:46 PM
318 Views
When chat used to be down for long stretches, everyone would just pile into AIM chat.
- 10/10/2010 06:54:33 PM
569 Views
Which they could easily do with Skype and get voice, yet no one does.
- 10/10/2010 10:56:55 PM
601 Views
The idea of voice chat creeps me out on so many levels *NM*
- 11/10/2010 12:34:22 AM
542 Views
Is that why the Edinburgh gathering pics are always nothing but sign language and dirty gestures? *NM*
- 11/10/2010 10:36:00 PM
313 Views
*NM*
The group that is popularized as being a part of that is not enticing to long standing wotmaniacs. *NM*
- 11/10/2010 03:29:57 AM
337 Views
Then that, again, seems a problem that coding can't solve.
- 11/10/2010 07:33:32 AM
587 Views
I don't think most want to download another program when they had it so easy before.
- 11/10/2010 10:39:55 PM
607 Views
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem.
- 12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM
605 Views
I disagree. I don't think enough people think it worth the effort to deal with Skype.
- 12/10/2010 04:28:21 AM
518 Views
What effort?
- 12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM
494 Views
Re:
- 12/10/2010 11:00:56 PM
393 Views
Then where are they?
- 13/10/2010 04:00:46 AM
468 Views
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007.
- 13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM
527 Views
Again, that's people, and not/having Chat won't change that.
- 13/10/2010 04:45:40 AM
525 Views
Incorrect
- 13/10/2010 04:58:30 AM
537 Views
Initially only the person who started it can boot.
- 13/10/2010 05:12:27 AM
602 Views
Re: Initially only the person who started it can boot.
- 13/10/2010 02:45:50 PM
481 Views
Sounds right; don't really know much about The Tavern except that's all in character.
- 14/10/2010 04:54:06 AM
539 Views
What do you mean where are they? There isn't a chat linked to the site.
- 13/10/2010 10:44:10 PM
576 Views
So?
- 14/10/2010 04:52:37 AM
546 Views
Are you deliberately trying to not understand?
- 14/10/2010 05:54:16 AM
654 Views
I have to admit that I highly doubt I would ever participate if a revived chat were installed
- 13/10/2010 05:08:38 AM
520 Views
Most of the group consists of long-standing Wotmaniacs, so. *NM*
- 12/10/2010 05:25:39 AM
301 Views
I probably didn't phrase that right. Maybe an -er after long and an "in good" before standing.
- 12/10/2010 11:02:30 PM
549 Views
Plenty of people who've been around as long as you, and plenty in good standing. *NM*
- 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM
280 Views
I see that my comments are being interpeted as a blanket insult to all parties involved...
- 13/10/2010 11:09:09 PM
575 Views
Also "as long as me" doesn't really factor, because I wasn't using myself to set the bar.
- 13/10/2010 11:26:29 PM
590 Views
Also, what qualifies as "good standing"? Who's the judge? *NM*
- 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM
345 Views
Jonte is right. The judges are numerous. Each with their own motivations and interests. *NM*
- 13/10/2010 11:10:04 PM
276 Views
I'd fuck myself to death with a spike of frozen cat piss before I'd chat with that skype crowd.
- 13/10/2010 11:42:16 PM
590 Views
*NM*
we are Rafonauts now.
- 13/10/2010 03:16:32 PM
421 Views
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though.
- 13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM
602 Views
There's a Chat if you want one.
- 10/10/2010 11:01:57 PM
580 Views
i wouldn't say mutely
- 10/10/2010 11:40:13 PM
540 Views
Well, like I said, talk about something else.
- 11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM
521 Views
do you know how hard it is stopping sports fanatics talking about sports?
- 11/10/2010 09:59:56 AM
571 Views