It was the family friendly argument at WOT that brought the swear filter. We've been rather open about it here at RAFO so far, at least until someone takes it to ridiculous degrees. I don't get what the difference between f*ck and fuck's supposed to be anyway.
Places of work, schools etc can have firewalls that block sites without swear filters or stop people going onto the messageboard if it has swearing in post titles (I recall that giving people problems at wotmania, where words that weren't caught in the swear filter were enough to be blocked by school networks, "sex" for example stopped someone, Tim it might even have been, from going to the Comm boardif it was in a post title)
Basically the difference is that the former is much less likely to stop someone being able to access the site, which is probably not a bad thing if people want the site to survive and grow

Then again, we won't make people write "S*x survey" as subject line to avoid collisions with filters, so it seems to work with the way it's handled right now. At least I think we didn't hear anything about someone being unable to access the site regularly. And people at school should pay attention anyway, not surf the net
*MySmiley*
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Can we swear at RAFO?
- 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM
1171 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear.
- 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM
832 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk???
- 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM
810 Views
I can't think of underage users
- 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM
866 Views
Well
- 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM
868 Views
That's a good point of course
- 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM
783 Views
Obviously we don't know what we don't know.</Rumsfeld>
- 22/11/2010 12:33:53 PM
892 Views
Apparently it's not high on Ben's priority list, so we seem to be fine for now. *NM*
- 22/11/2010 12:38:42 PM
401 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches.
- 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM
851 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles?
- 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM
727 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient?
- 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM
890 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb
- 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM
785 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy.
- 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM
907 Views
Subroutines such as what?
- 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM
1137 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now.
- 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM
1148 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless...
- 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM
796 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none.
- 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM
812 Views
well...
- 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM
822 Views
Re: well...
- 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM
801 Views
Re: well...
- 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM
780 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people.
- 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM
858 Views
new people is not the same as children.
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
387 Views
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
387 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college.
- 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM
824 Views
Please.
- 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM
830 Views
Of course they do; who do you think creates all those time sink--er, games?
- 23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
786 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
786 Views
I resent that.
- 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
697 Views
- 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
697 Views
Yeah, I may have skipped a few important people, too; sorry.
- 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
875 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
875 Views
the whole community was younger then. It really doesn't apply to today.
- 24/11/2010 07:50:56 AM
762 Views
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals
- 24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM
863 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles
- 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM
790 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
- 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM
781 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk.
- 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
942 Views
- 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
942 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE.
- 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM
826 Views
I used the search function, it was just the number of post that had those in their title
- 22/11/2010 07:45:18 PM
758 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM*
- 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM
408 Views
Hey there!
- 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM
997 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though.
- 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM
859 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
381 Views
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
381 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth
- 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM
773 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though.
- 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
788 Views
- 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
788 Views

Back off!
*NM*
*NM*