The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches.
Joel Send a noteboard - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM
It was the family friendly argument at WOT that brought the swear filter. We've been rather open about it here at RAFO so far, at least until someone takes it to ridiculous degrees. I don't get what the difference between f*ck and fuck's supposed to be anyway.
Otherwise I see no difference, but given how many schools, businesses and homes use such filtering, I see no upside to the lack of a language filter here, and some very real downsides. Would wotmania have been the same without Clover? Sprite? Urza? They were VERY young when they joined wotmania; had current parental controls been available then they might never have known it existed, let alone become integral to it. Much the same goes for the wealth of people who were most active on the site when they were at work: Businesses that screen out sites with "offensive" content make that impossible for sites with no filter.
The question is whether automatically excluding whole swathes of the worlds population from RAFO is justified by the ability to say, "bitch" rather than "bitch". I just fail to see how it possibly could be.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 22/11/2010 at 12:06:48 PM
Can we swear at RAFO?
22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM
- 1042 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear.
22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM
- 667 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk???
22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 693 Views
I can't think of underage users
22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM
- 748 Views
Well
22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM
- 751 Views
That's a good point of course
22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM
- 666 Views
Obviously we don't know what we don't know.</Rumsfeld>
22/11/2010 12:33:53 PM
- 774 Views
Apparently it's not high on Ben's priority list, so we seem to be fine for now. *NM*
22/11/2010 12:38:42 PM
- 342 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches.
22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM
- 734 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles?
22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM
- 585 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient?
22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM
- 747 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb
22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM
- 669 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy.
22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM
- 780 Views
Subroutines such as what?
22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM
- 990 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now.
22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM
- 998 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless...
23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM
- 647 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none.
23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM
- 692 Views
well...
23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM
- 704 Views
Re: well...
23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM
- 679 Views
Re: well...
23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM
- 653 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people.
23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM
- 732 Views
new people is not the same as children.
*NM*
23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
- 336 Views

True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college.
23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM
- 693 Views
Please.
23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM
- 700 Views
Of course they do; who do you think creates all those time sink--er, games?
23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
- 660 Views

I resent that.
23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
- 577 Views

Yeah, I may have skipped a few important people, too; sorry.
23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
- 760 Views

the whole community was younger then. It really doesn't apply to today.
24/11/2010 07:50:56 AM
- 646 Views
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals
24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM
- 736 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles
22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM
- 674 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM
- 663 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk.
22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
- 819 Views

Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE.
22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM
- 703 Views
I used the search function, it was just the number of post that had those in their title
22/11/2010 07:45:18 PM
- 634 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM*
22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM
- 353 Views
Hey there!
22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM
- 861 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though.
23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM
- 746 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help
*NM*
23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
- 326 Views

All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth
23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM
- 633 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though.
23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
- 673 Views
