Active Users:1477 Time:01/05/2026 06:13:40 PM
I love how you made Adam into a positive Kronin al'Sulc Send a noteboard - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM
It was the family friendly argument at WOT that brought the swear filter. We've been rather open about it here at RAFO so far, at least until someone takes it to ridiculous degrees. I don't get what the difference between f*ck and fuck's supposed to be anyway.

Otherwise I see no difference, but given how many schools, businesses and homes use such filtering, I see no upside to the lack of a language filter here, and some very real downsides. Would wotmania have been the same without Clover? Sprite? Urza? They were VERY young when they joined wotmania; had current parental controls been available then they might never have known it existed, let alone become integral to it. Much the same goes for the wealth of people who were most active on the site when they were at work: Businesses that screen out sites with "offensive" content make that impossible for sites with no filter.

The question is whether automatically excluding whole swathes of the worlds population from RAFO is justified by the ability to say, "bitch" rather than "bitch". I just fail to see how it possibly could be.
At last, I have an apostrophe!

*MySmiley*
Foil fencers Dance the Spears. Or, at least, the foils.

Too stubborn to remove that extraneous *MySmiley*

~The Decapitator~
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 1134 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 784 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 776 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 413 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 648 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 432 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 392 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 374 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 835 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 831 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 748 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 875 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 701 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 752 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 639 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 765 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 440 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 819 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 679 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 854 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 756 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 870 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 1089 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 1117 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 745 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 775 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 783 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 766 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 743 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 819 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 368 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 780 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 794 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 662 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 388 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 829 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 759 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 751 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 908 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 795 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 757 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 806 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 866 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 803 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 387 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 953 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 703 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 697 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 273 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 826 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 363 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 723 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 758 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 641 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 742 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 694 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 752 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 740 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 759 Views

Reply to Message