We're not debating swearing on RAFO; that's not going anywhere (at least, I hope not). We're debating whether we should have the ability to proudly say, "This site HAS no language filter", which seems a pretty small thing for which to sacrifice dozens or perhaps hundreds of potential members. Put another way: Which do you think RAFO needs more right now, new blood, or the ability to write "shit" instead of "shit"?
To be honest, if the alternative to writing shit is an influx of underage americans, keep the shit flowing. 
*shrugs* I'm resigned to RAFOS slow but steady evacuation; no skin off my nose. As the underage Americans say, "It's your funeral.... "
Please. The internet is a big place. I don't want the spot I am in invaded by people I have nothing in common with. If that can be ensured by just avoiding to add a language filter, I am all for not adding such a thing. I think you vastly overestimate the number of potential members (3) who think such a filter is a technical necessity anyway... So I am afraid we'll have to live with the brats infecting this place
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Can we swear at RAFO?
- 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM
1090 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear.
- 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM
720 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk???
- 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM
735 Views
I can't think of underage users
- 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM
789 Views
Well
- 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM
795 Views
That's a good point of course
- 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM
705 Views
Obviously we don't know what we don't know.</Rumsfeld>
- 22/11/2010 12:33:53 PM
818 Views
Apparently it's not high on Ben's priority list, so we seem to be fine for now. *NM*
- 22/11/2010 12:38:42 PM
362 Views
Back off!
*NM*
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches.
- 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM
783 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles?
- 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM
629 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient?
- 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM
811 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb
- 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM
713 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy.
- 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM
825 Views
Subroutines such as what?
- 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM
1045 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now.
- 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM
1070 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless...
- 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM
695 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none.
- 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM
738 Views
well...
- 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM
747 Views
Re: well...
- 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM
724 Views
Re: well...
- 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM
703 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people.
- 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM
778 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
352 Views
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
352 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college.
- 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM
743 Views
Please.
- 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM
748 Views
Of course they do; who do you think creates all those time sink--er, games? 
- 23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
701 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
701 Views
I resent that.
- 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
618 Views
- 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
618 Views
Yeah, I may have skipped a few important people, too; sorry. 
- 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
799 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
799 Views
the whole community was younger then. It really doesn't apply to today.
- 24/11/2010 07:50:56 AM
687 Views
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals
- 24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM
782 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles
- 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM
717 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
- 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM
708 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. 
- 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
860 Views
- 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
860 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE.
- 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM
745 Views
I used the search function, it was just the number of post that had those in their title
- 22/11/2010 07:45:18 PM
677 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM*
- 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM
369 Views
Hey there!
- 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM
904 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though.
- 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM
785 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
341 Views
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
341 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth
- 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM
678 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though.
- 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
712 Views
- 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
712 Views