Active Users:1251 Time:14/09/2026 01:15:55 PM
I resent that. Legolas Send a noteboard - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
To be honest, if the alternative to writing shit is an influx of underage americans, keep the shit flowing. :P

Okay, I'm not American, but this site (okay, the previous site) would so not have been the same without Clover, shaza, Alesandra, Jessie, and so on.
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 1188 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 847 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 829 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 442 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 707 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 459 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 419 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 406 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 888 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 889 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 802 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 931 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 754 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 808 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 694 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 821 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 476 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 873 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 744 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 910 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 803 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 925 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 1156 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 1168 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 813 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 833 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 849 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 823 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 798 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 892 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 397 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 846 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 847 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 717 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 414 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 879 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 811 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 803 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 961 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 849 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 814 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 860 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 918 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 861 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 418 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 1014 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 749 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 752 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 299 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 880 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 393 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 794 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 808 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 704 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 797 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 749 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 800 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 794 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 811 Views

Reply to Message