Active Users:462 Time:18/09/2025 02:52:21 PM
They had better have a green man *NM* Camilla Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM
NASA Sets News Conference on Astrobiology Discovery; Science Journal Has Embargoed Details Until 2 p.m. EST On Dec. 2

WASHINGTON -- NASA will hold a news conference at 2 p.m. EST on Thursday, Dec. 2, to discuss an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life. Astrobiology is the study of the origin, evolution, distribution and future of life in the universe.

The news conference will be held at the NASA Headquarters auditorium at 300 E St. SW, in Washington. It will be broadcast live on NASA Television and streamed on the agency's website at http://www.nasa.gov.

Participants are:

- Mary Voytek, director, Astrobiology Program, NASA Headquarters, Washington

- Felisa Wolfe-Simon, NASA astrobiology research fellow, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.

- Pamela Conrad, astrobiologist, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.

- Steven Benner, distinguished fellow, Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, Gainesville, Fla.

- James Elser, professor, Arizona State University, Tempe

Media representatives may attend the conference or ask questions by phone or from participating NASA locations. To obtain dial-in information, journalists must send their name, affiliation and telephone number to Steve Cole at stephen.e.cole@nasa.gov or call 202-358-0918 by noon Dec. 2.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1121 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 606 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 738 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 304 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 285 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 640 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 763 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 691 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 683 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 607 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 731 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 310 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 247 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 595 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 638 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 577 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 773 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 705 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 672 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 749 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 292 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 257 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 636 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 713 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 659 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 858 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 642 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 951 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 625 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 865 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 575 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 767 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 650 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 610 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 575 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 580 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 715 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 673 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 257 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 651 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 593 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 263 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 607 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 585 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 617 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 230 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 233 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 230 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 574 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 672 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 244 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 259 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 720 Views

Reply to Message