Active Users:1475 Time:15/03/2026 06:24:52 PM
I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet ranagrande Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 03:56:38 AM
The laws of physics only apply within the universe. Trying to apply them "outside" or "before" the universe is simply nonsensical, because those spatial and temporal concepts only exist as part of the universe.

So you choose to believe in option 2, the eternal universe? It's as valid an interpretation as any other.

It's irrational to believe in something without a reason, i.e. evidence (or a logical proof whose assumptions fit known evidence). No evidence or logic suggests the universe has any human characteristics (or cat characteristics, just to be thorough), so there is no reason to believe that.

For the record, I tend to agree that the universe is not innately human- or cat-like. However, I find it just as irrational to believe that the universe has always existed or that it sprang from nothing. No evidence or logic supports those theories either.
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1195 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 651 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 796 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 326 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 314 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 687 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 810 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 741 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 736 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 649 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 778 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 331 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 269 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 644 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 688 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 627 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 819 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 753 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 719 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 828 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 312 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 276 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 688 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 780 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 707 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 898 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 692 Views
Time does not exist separately from space, as Einstein demonstrated almost a century ago. - 01/12/2010 03:36:56 AM 774 Views
I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet - 01/12/2010 03:56:38 AM 1037 Views
Re: I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet - 01/12/2010 04:30:44 AM 1079 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 999 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 674 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 911 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 620 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 813 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 701 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 662 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 618 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 656 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 759 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 717 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 279 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 697 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 638 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 285 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 654 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 630 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 662 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 250 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 253 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 258 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 618 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 720 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 265 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 281 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 768 Views

Reply to Message