Active Users:931 Time:28/10/2025 01:56:08 AM
It won't change the argument in the least. Dannymac Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM
Atheists will use it as proof of no God, a logical impossibility, and Theists will use it as proof of God, an impossibility of faith. Just like they do with everything else. Meanwhile, those more interested in what they (as opposed to everyone else) wish to believe will add it as just another data point to consider.

Interesting in and of itself, but definitely not a deal breaker, God-wise.
Eschew Verbosity
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1151 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 616 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 751 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 309 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 297 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 651 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 774 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 701 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 694 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 615 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 742 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 316 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 252 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 606 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 649 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 587 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 784 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 714 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 682 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 772 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 296 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 260 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 646 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 736 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 671 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 869 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 654 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 960 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 634 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 876 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 585 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 776 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 660 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 621 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 582 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 613 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 725 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 684 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 264 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 660 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 603 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 267 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 615 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 595 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 627 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 233 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 236 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 235 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 582 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 679 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 247 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 265 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 727 Views

Reply to Message