Because, out of all the choices for the 2022 Cup, the U.S. and Australia are the best choices
Brian Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 06:32:08 PM
They may not be world powers, but their teams are good enough that they at least are competitive and would qualify for the tournament on their own.
When the other options for 2022 are Qatar, Japan, and South Korea, then I would say that Australia and the U.S. look great in comparison.
So yeah, while Football may not be the most popular sport in either country by a long shot, it is something that is growing in popularity in both countries, they are safe, won't be 110 degrees during the tournament, and didn't host it in 2002.
When the other options for 2022 are Qatar, Japan, and South Korea, then I would say that Australia and the U.S. look great in comparison.
So yeah, while Football may not be the most popular sport in either country by a long shot, it is something that is growing in popularity in both countries, they are safe, won't be 110 degrees during the tournament, and didn't host it in 2002.
2018 and 2022 World Cup predictions
- 01/12/2010 01:24:15 AM
1088 Views
I'm hoping on the Netherlands/Belgium bid for 2018, and Australia for 2022. *NM*
- 01/12/2010 02:35:39 AM
332 Views
I think you are right
- 01/12/2010 01:03:05 PM
740 Views
Re: I think you are right
- 01/12/2010 06:39:09 PM
999 Views
You do realize Mexico has hosted not one, but two World Cups, right? *NM*
- 01/12/2010 07:56:35 PM
346 Views
Yes
- 01/12/2010 09:08:44 PM
918 Views
Why would anyone vote for Australia?
- 01/12/2010 06:03:15 PM
736 Views
Because, out of all the choices for the 2022 Cup, the U.S. and Australia are the best choices
- 01/12/2010 06:32:08 PM
817 Views
Your opinion that Australia is better than Japan and SK doesn't seem to be based on facts.
- 01/12/2010 07:59:14 PM
711 Views
It's based on reality
- 01/12/2010 09:13:20 PM
1011 Views
Ah, we seem to have a misunderstanding then, your post was a bit confusing.
- 01/12/2010 10:21:08 PM
719 Views
Yeah, reading over it again it does seem like that's what I was implying.
- 01/12/2010 10:39:38 PM
952 Views

