Active Users:658 Time:15/03/2026 01:14:48 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: No and depends Macharius Send a noteboard - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM
I think it should because I think there are real issues with the consent part of it - both in terms of grooming until that relative is old enough and a family member being better able to pressure them into consenting than they really want to.


I'm pretty sure the law draws a distinction between consent and coercion. Also, you're assuming a parent/child situation, which is not the sole relationship encompassed. To draw a site-related example: what about ASoIaF, with Jamie and Cersie?
Reply to message
Some legal questions. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM 716 Views
Yes to both Maria - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM 474 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM 462 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children. Macharius - 12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM 436 Views
Incest with children is outside the scope of the question posed. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:38:39 PM 413 Views
Who brought children into it? Tim - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM 429 Views
No and depends snoopcester - 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM 465 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM 415 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM 417 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM 413 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM 378 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM 396 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM 176 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. Joel - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM 423 Views
You're confusing two separate issues. Tom - 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM 423 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well. Joel - 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM 393 Views
How? Why? Tom - 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM 427 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. Joel - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM 376 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM 464 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM 448 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM 403 Views
Of course a corpse is property. Tom - 13/01/2011 05:27:34 AM 426 Views
Apparently it isn't, at least in California. Tim - 13/01/2011 09:35:29 AM 495 Views
Strangely Camilla - 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM 361 Views
consensual necrophilia? moondog - 12/01/2011 09:40:44 PM 419 Views
Re: consensual necrophilia? Rebekah - 12/01/2011 09:43:40 PM 387 Views
no to both random thoughts - 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM 419 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM 412 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong random thoughts - 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM 407 Views
Hm? nossy - 12/01/2011 11:07:19 PM 419 Views
Well said (on both) *NM* ironclad - 12/01/2011 11:22:08 PM 181 Views
Interesting... globug0822 - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM 405 Views
yes to both *NM* Aisha - 13/01/2011 06:21:39 AM 161 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Novo - 13/01/2011 08:33:18 AM 416 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Darth_Katie - 13/01/2011 07:06:04 PM 422 Views
hhmmmm mick - 14/01/2011 03:55:38 AM 393 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes